If he'd even mentioned the word "Bradley", even if he put it in context and mentioned "her" new name, Youtube would've taken down the video for "deadnaming".
Edit: They do mention his name, briefly, later in the video.
If he'd even mentioned the word "Bradley", even if he put it in context and mentioned "her" new name, Youtube would've taken down the video for "deadnaming".
Edit: They *do* mention his name, briefly, later in the video.
"Private Manning stole documents related to .... " Problem solved, you stay on message keeping your audience focused on the bigger point.
Instead this faggot chooses to repeatedly pander to deviants. His behavior demonstrates that he is more concerned with not offending degenerates than he is with the abuse suffered by Assange at the hands of his government.
PS everyone knows about Assange the problem is that not offending degenerates is currently a bigger priority for society. Case in point, this video.
"Private Manning stole documents related to .... " Problem solved, you stay on message keeping your audience focused on the bigger point.
Instead this faggot chooses to repeatedly pander to deviants. His behavior demonstrates that he is more concerned with not offending degenerates than he is with the abuse suffered by Assange at the hands of his government.
PS everyone knows about Assange the problem is that not offending degenerates is currently a bigger priority for society. Case in point, this video.
(post is archived)