I didn’t say touch neither did the guy in the video. To touch with your and to strike with a hammer will not have the same effect on the atomic structure of the steel. It’s the shock from the impact of the hammer that causes the atomic deformation of the steel to delay movement at the other end. If what your saying is true the hammer wouldn’t exist. We could simply touch a nail and it would go in. Did you watch the video or are you just surfing comments looking for shit to “disagree with”?
Sigh read between the fucking lines. To strike, to touch, to hit are all the same thing.
To touch with your and to strike with a hammer will not have the same effect on the atomic structure of the steel.
Correct but in the proof of solidness that's a meaningless distinction. The speed at which you "hit" versus "touch" is insignificant of a difference when the resultant reaction is thousands and thousands of time the relevant speed. (F = MA, so speed (acceleration) increase also increases Force).
If speed (acceleration) increase’s force doesn’t that prove that striking with a moving mass rather then placing against and then applying force only prove my point. Sigh read between the lines
If speed (acceleration) increase’s force doesn’t that prove that striking with a moving mass rather then placing against and then applying force only prove my point.
... Why are you intentionally ignoring the speed at which the signal traveled? The speed of sound through a solid body of steel is 5940m/s. And you're using that intentionally left-out information in your dishonest posts. A hand traveling at .5 m/s and touching a bar of steel will not change the speed of sound in that body of steel, neither will a hammer traveling at 10 m/s and hitting a bar of steel.
I'm not discussing this any further when you're intentionally warping youre question in a manner that leaves out the important bits of info that prove your question wrong from the outset.
(post is archived)