This is a physics experiment. "to strike" and "to touch" are the same exact thing. They're both "touching" an object regardless of force used. That detail, if it were important would have been added to the project.
I didn’t say touch neither did the guy in the video. To touch with your and to strike with a hammer will not have the same effect on the atomic structure of the steel. It’s the shock from the impact of the hammer that causes the atomic deformation of the steel to delay movement at the other end. If what your saying is true the hammer wouldn’t exist. We could simply touch a nail and it would go in. Did you watch the video or are you just surfing comments looking for shit to “disagree with”?
Sigh read between the fucking lines. To strike, to touch, to hit are all the same thing.
To touch with your and to strike with a hammer will not have the same effect on the atomic structure of the steel.
Correct but in the proof of solidness that's a meaningless distinction. The speed at which you "hit" versus "touch" is insignificant of a difference when the resultant reaction is thousands and thousands of time the relevant speed. (F = MA, so speed (acceleration) increase also increases Force).
If speed (acceleration) increase’s force doesn’t that prove that striking with a moving mass rather then placing against and then applying force only prove my point. Sigh read between the lines
(post is archived)