based slant. shameful lack of response. Though its more valuable tbh that he avoids answering that question to be honest. His doco would just get called antisemetic and he would get cancelled so fucking hard by the cucked right. Its better that the documentary can stand on its own without drawing unwarranted criticism. There are plenty of great people who have called out the jew and sometimes its good to have a specific person for a specific job, some people are good for broad appeal and others for niche appeal. Some can hook many people and bring them in from the other side, others can take them from right leaning to full right and others can take them further still. You would be hard pressed to find anyone who can take people from left or left leaning to far right in one go. Its weak from an ideological stance but its pragmatically valuable to have people who can dominate specific issues. walsh and petersen dont need to be calling out jews to have value, we can separate their arguments from the person and use them if they are truthful, and throw out the trash they have. I dont tell everyone that i meet that im against the jews, i will tailor my approach to the individual and work on picking their mental lock with the right tools without triggering their alarms. Sometimes you need to hammer the truth into people to break the spell, sometimes you need to unbalance them and tilt them in the right direction, sometimes you need to be delicate with them and avoid their defense mechanisms. I know how evil the enemy is and how important it is to call them out and reveal the slimy hand behind this degeneracy, but being so black and white with any ally can lose us a lot of ground. we need to learn to not trust so much in man but in truth and logic. Calling out grifters has value in ensuring that nobody becomes so valued that people believe anything they say, kinda like trump, but demonizing them can just alienate others for simply not being 'pure' enough. That can be extremely detrimental to our cause.