Its at 44:18 now
To be fair, not much he could say. The kid was probably a plant there to paint him either as a Nazi or controlled op. Look like he had a script there on his phone.
Better to be transparent and show your power level from the start.
High probability. They get the word "jew" mentioned and it is all painted as antisemitism.
based slant.
shameful lack of response.
Though its more valuable tbh that he avoids answering that question to be honest. His doco would just get called antisemetic and he would get cancelled so fucking hard by the cucked right.
Its better that the documentary can stand on its own without drawing unwarranted criticism.
There are plenty of great people who have called out the jew and sometimes its good to have a specific person for a specific job, some people are good for broad appeal and others for niche appeal. Some can hook many people and bring them in from the other side, others can take them from right leaning to full right and others can take them further still. You would be hard pressed to find anyone who can take people from left or left leaning to far right in one go.
Its weak from an ideological stance but its pragmatically valuable to have people who can dominate specific issues. walsh and petersen dont need to be calling out jews to have value, we can separate their arguments from the person and use them if they are truthful, and throw out the trash they have. I dont tell everyone that i meet that im against the jews, i will tailor my approach to the individual and work on picking their mental lock with the right tools without triggering their alarms. Sometimes you need to hammer the truth into people to break the spell, sometimes you need to unbalance them and tilt them in the right direction, sometimes you need to be delicate with them and avoid their defense mechanisms.
I know how evil the enemy is and how important it is to call them out and reveal the slimy hand behind this degeneracy, but being so black and white with any ally can lose us a lot of ground. we need to learn to not trust so much in man but in truth and logic. Calling out grifters has value in ensuring that nobody becomes so valued that people believe anything they say, kinda like trump, but demonizing them can just alienate others for simply not being 'pure' enough. That can be extremely detrimental to our cause.
Its better that the documentary can stand on its own without drawing unwarranted criticism.
Why bother with a documentary when you can't name who is responsible? Naming them is the only thing that will make a difference.
Because very few people can swallow the entirety of the red pill at once. Incremental steps are about the only way you get through to most people without triggering their defense systems.
Anyone that isn't guzzling kike cock is a worthy ally. And anyone just paying lip service is still worth considering, even if it's just as our own useful idiot. It's why I haven't fully written off Giorgia Meloni yet. Sure she's said a lot of things, but she's a politician, that's what they do: say things to get into power. Her actions determine her worth.
Questioner: Can you at least acknowledge there appears to be a hook-nosed elephant in the room?
Walsh: No.
That wasn't the question. It was purposefully framed to be as big of a landmine as possible.
Don't be so gullible with jew tricks.
This guy works for Ben Shapiro, did you think he would dare say something bad about the jews?
Lol @ the comments.
By the way they must’ve edited the video or something because it’s just under an hour now, so the clip you mentioned isn’t there anymore
So basically more controlled opposition.
The kid is right but at the same time the way he asked the question, the informality of it, the tone of voice, all discredited his point. When this subject is approached at an event like this or with people like Matt Walsh it needs to be in a professional, serious way that allows facts to drive the point home
The video is 59 mins long
Not even addressing the issue... Something something controlled opposition if you ask me
What would a fully red-pilled ubermensch trying to hide his power level look like?
Probably somebody who doesn't work for Ben Shapiro, for a start.
Only criticize individuals based on their behavior. If there is a large number of people who commit common critical behaviors who happen to be the same ethnicity or religion, that is a coincidence. A consistent coincidence becomes an objective truth. Having an opinion based on an objective truth is not wrong. Has anyone been canceled for saying that Italians speak with their hands?
Powerful.
(post is archived)