civilization began in the Middle East about 4000 years ago as described in the Bible. When you stretch back to 12,000 years, the events in the Bible change their perspective.

There are many issues with the common timeline pushed in Christianity. Largely, this timeline exists because they didn't know many anchor points in history onto which they could attach their timeline. The result is a hyper compressed biblical timeline. This is, for example, why they can say there were no slaves in Egypt. Well, there wasn't at the specific point in time they look because it's at the wrong point in time.

Some Christians are taught the great flood was a couple thousand years ago. But the Great Flood is the Younger Dryas Event, which was roughly 11,800 years ago. This means the post-flood history is more than double of what many Christians believe is the entire lifespan of the world.

Additionally, there is strong geological evidence that Egypt is roughly 13,000 years old. So on and so on... This is hardly the only ancient structure which aligns with this timetable of roughly 12,000-13,000 years ago. And even in Egypt you find the swastika from this time period.

Pretty much every culture which still has calendar records tells us that the Earth has been restarted multiple times. The last time by flood. Pretty consistently, they all point back to roughly 11,000-12,000 years ago for the last reset.

As for cro-magnon, something unexplained happened some 30,000-35,000 years ago. For completely unknown reasons cro-magnon started complex art, social structure, agriculture, complex language, and began to use more complex tools. We are descendants of cro-magnon. They had bigger brains than us. This event, IMOHO, is the Adam and Eve event.

Add to that that you CANNOT put a bunch of niggers in northern europe 100 000 years ago and get blonde blue eyed people. This just isn't possible.

We have been around for 100s of thousands of years if not longer.

And that means what? Myth are ancient legends and legends are stories of old. Too much of our history has been kikeverted, so we can not know. We can only see the megalithic structures left behind from before and after the last ice age. And from this we can draw the conclusion that high technology was indeed in use. That there are submerged ancient cities off the coast of egypt is not a myth.

So who is to say that a continent called atlantis was present at some time in the middle of the atlantic? Faggot?

No it isn't. It's written about and has great history catalogued by ancient Greek and Roman historians. These pieces of fact are hidden due to it being a White civilization.

They had come from the direction of the setting Son (so west)

Atlantis was There's a giant "crater" there with evidence of significant water and irrigation that's not allowed to be studied or excavated. Wonder why?

There is no evidence it is a myth. The entire basis for the claim it's a myth is that it supposes a high civilization which people claimed is impossible. Except now we have overwhelming evidence ancient high civilizations existed all over the world and from a common group of people. There is evidence it existed like a strong written record and many advanced structures.

Remember, it wasn't so long ago they claimed Troy was a myth. Except they've now confirmed Troy existed.

There is a combination of hubris and willful revisionism to hide our history. Largely, only two groups are effected by this. Whites because of our global ancestry and Jews because it proves them liars.