“The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause.”
I would. Nothing inherently wrong with propaganda.
“The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause.”
I would. Nothing inherently wrong with propaganda.
You forgot to include the part where it says "propaganda, dissemination of information—facts, arguments, rumours, half-truths, or lies—to influence public opinion." Today it is all lies because the influence is not in the public interest.
You forgot to include the part where it says "propaganda, dissemination of information—facts, arguments, rumours, half-truths, or lies—to influence public opinion." Today it is all lies because the influence is not in the public interest.
Nothing inherently wrong with propaganda.
This is exactly what Propaganda by Edward Bernays claimed. Great book.
> Nothing inherently wrong with propaganda.
This is exactly what Propaganda by Edward Bernays claimed. Great book.
Bernays, nephew to the father of mother fucking (literally) psychology, Sigmund Freud.
Bernays, nephew to the father of mother fucking (*literally*) psychology, Sigmund Freud.
(post is archived)