Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

TL;DW WHO will get to define "pandemic", control our pandemic response and dictate our pandemic preparedness they get to define truth and misinformation and if we don't enforce censorship or any other aspect to their liking every member nation to the treaty is required to sanction us under threat of sanction themselves.

TL;DW WHO will get to define "pandemic", control our pandemic response and dictate our pandemic preparedness they get to define truth and misinformation and if we don't enforce censorship or any other aspect to their liking every member nation to the treaty is required to sanction us under threat of sanction themselves.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (24).
[–] • 1 pt

Treaties require ratification..that is, if you want to bring the constitution into it.

[–] • 1 pt

The Senate is majority libturds and RINOS so ratification shouldn't be a problem.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Even with ratification, a treaty in conflict with the constitution is null and void and unenforceable. Legally and constitutionally that is.

Only constitutional amendments, as created by due and lawful process, can change constitutional law. Treaties have no effect. In fact, are void if in conflict.