Even without that, local jurisdictions and even entire states would simply refuse to abide by it.

You talk about elections as if they aren’t rigged.

Treaties don't usurp the constitution. Signing up for the explicit purpose of sanction isn't enforceable in any court.

It's the same as them declaring, surrender your human rights or we'll sanction you.

Assuming the greatest election fraud organization the world has ever known falters in its mission,voting works.

It has to start with truckers and farmers literally saying "yeah, go fuck yourself General Mills, Kellogg and all the other major food producers. No more food to your cities, and no more groceries on the highways."

That's all it would take.

In 45 days these blue cities would be burned to the ground by niggers and fat central americans who aren't getting their SNAP food because it's all gone and the supermarkets aren't being restocked.

https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/Statistics/

Over a third of the country's vegetables and two-thirds of the country's fruits and nuts are grown in California.

You cant really abandon California, Im afraid. California needs to be taken back. Its too big of an economy to cede.

There is a pretty big conservative population here and a shit ton of commie foreigners and illegals. Why do you all just move here for a year during election years we can turn this state red? Then we can pass laws to round up the commies and put them into prison.

The Senate is majority libturds and RINOS so ratification shouldn't be a problem.

Even with ratification, a treaty in conflict with the constitution is null and void and unenforceable. Legally and constitutionally that is.

Only constitutional amendments, as created by due and lawful process, can change constitutional law. Treaties have no effect. In fact, are void if in conflict.