WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

This is the best question to ask all leftists.

This is the best question to ask all leftists.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I can’t watch Matt Walsh. He’s owned by the noses.

[–] 0 pt

I don't like Christianity because they worship a kike but I still listen to what they have to say. They still bring up good points every now and then.

This "bury your head in the sand" mentality is what the left does, so if you want to emulate their behavior go for it.

[–] 0 pt

He didn't say he didn't like Christianity. He said he can't watch that crypto jew yid all over the place. Oy vey! here goy check out this hot take. This is Christian, only this. Don't like this? me either, lets go suck some Odin'scock. fuking op, dirty fag

[–] 0 pt

Matt Walsh is as much of a crypto kike as every fucking Christian is. That's why I brought it up, everythin Matt Walsh says in this clip is factual, unlike the shit the jews wrote in the bible.

I prefer to take in all kinds of information, not just shit that adheres to a narrative in my head, like leftists do.

[–] 0 pt

I think someone so entrenched in the jew club must most certainly be running their playbook. Sure, it’s great he calls some attention to issues I care about, but he never mention any wrongdoings by his jewish overloads nor brings attention to jewish supremacy. Don’t you think that’s serious cause for concern?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I honestly can't think of a single example of somebody not entrenched in the jew club.

never mention any wrongdoings by his jewish overloads nor brings attention to jewish supremacy.

Other then Patrick Little, who has called out the jewish overlords? There is Owen Benjamin and Brother Nathaniel except they are self admitted Jews.

The fact is we have to navigate our world around the kikes having control of our position and our opposition

[–] 1 pt

I want to see the best answers, designed at triggering trannies. Here is my example.

"A woman is somebody with XX chromosomes and a uterus. Women have the ability to bring life into the world and they have wide hip bones to accommodate the new born baby"

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

The XX chromosomes make the womb develop so that is sufficient. All women have XX chromosomes.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Be careful with that rabbit hole. There are all kinds of mutants, X, XX, XXX for women, XYY for men (more prone to violence btw).

What you can say is that, except for one recorded freak case, no "woman" who has ever given birth has had any Y chromosomes.

No Y chromosomes = woman.

Oh, and I don't trust this pundit asshole in the video. Controlled opposition attempt.

[–] 0 pt

Serious question. Who isn't controlled opposition? The only people speaking out on our side are kikes, niggers and Christian zionists.

I don't think it's all as black and white as you make it out to be.

There is no need to mention chromosomes. Biologists distinguish male from female in a sexually reproducing species based on degree of parental investment. Females have high parental investment. Making an egg is costly and the female makes relatively few of them. On the other hand, males make many many sperm and thus have low parental investment. Sexual dimorphism is simply specialization around these facts. Females make eggs. Males make sperm. A woman is a human female.

And yes, they might argue that some women can't have babies or don't produce eggs bevause of an injury or genetic disease. They are still women, but defective ones. If not for the defect they would be a reproductive member of the species