WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

They were right about some technologies, like the lights can be controlled by voice (Google Home or Amazon Alexa) and the glass that dims exits but only for airplanes for now. But they were already trying to push the Climate Change hoax back then, trying to get people to use less energy.

They were right about some technologies, like the lights can be controlled by voice (Google Home or Amazon Alexa) and the glass that dims exits but only for airplanes for now. But they were already trying to push the Climate Change hoax back then, trying to get people to use less energy.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts (edited )

The glass is available for the super rich and offices. Supposedly "smart rooms" that change decor such as paintings on digital frames etc..tied by phone and GPS is a thing as well all for the wealthy of course.

The global warming crises has been a cash cow for at least 100+ years.

[–] 2 pts

The goyim tax has been a cash cow for at least 100+ years.

[–] 2 pts

False. For like 30 years it was global cooling.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

What the people who write these kind of videos never take into account is cost and ease of use. Nobody is going to install something in their house that costs a fortune, and nobody is going to install something that is hard to use, fussy, and breaks frequently, because it will have to be fixed or it is useless. Solar panels on the roof are a case in point.

If you look at house design from 400 years ago, and compare it with today's houses, you will get a pretty good idea of what houses will look like 400 years from today. Our houses are not much different from the houses of Shakespeare's time. In fact, many people still live in houses built while Shakespeare was alive. They are rectangular, solid, with windows that open in every room, doors mounted on hinges, wood and masonry construction.

Construction techniques have changed somewhat, but the end result is remarkably similar, from the perspective of use. The biggest change was bringing the outhouse inside the house via modern plumbing -- but the Romans had modern plumbing 2000 years ago. Another change is door size. Four centuries ago, doors were smaller, because people were shorter. All houses in the 16th century had fireplaces, and today only some houses have fireplaces ... but the fireplace is essentially unchanged. A wall is a wall, a floor is a floor, stairs are stairs, doors are doors, windows are windows.

Those houses that stand out, that look like the come from science fiction, are very hard to sell. Nobody wants to buy "the home of the future." They don't want to get stuck with a white elephant. That's why geodesic domes never really took off as houses. The people who built them found that they couldn't sell them, because nobody wanted to buy them. House design is conservative by its very nature.

[–] 0 pt

The fireplace has changed quite a bit. Look at a house built in the 1700s/1800s. A fireplace was a giant open hearth, maybe 4ft tall. It was this way because you used it to cook, and it was used as the primary for heating. As central heating became more common in regular homes, the fireplace became smaller until it was nothing but a showpiece that will suck more heat out than it puts in to to the room. In order to get the same benefit our great-great-great grandparents did, we need an insert that doesn't allow the heat being generated to suck itself up the chimney.

But it's still a brick hole in the wall that you burn shit in, so it's primary method of operation remains the same.

That's a good point. Also some of the tech that the video talks about do have similarities to the current day smart home. Like a smart thermostat that knows when you're not home and it'll adjust the temperature up or down to use less energy, that's probably the idea they were going for with the auto lights.

[–] 1 pt

The tech we’re using now were working prototypes decades ago.

[–] 1 pt

They couldn't predict that almost no one would want to watch BBC by 2020.

[–] 1 pt

I find the lights constantly going on and off as you move to be really disconcerting. The building I work in used to have that until they started failing, and I replaced them with normal switches.

[–] 1 pt

There are a few good applications for those, like in closets or utility rooms. But it's annoying as fuck in an office space.

[–] 1 pt

The closets were fine, but they failed as well. The place was built just as the green craze was starting, so everything was on occupancy sensors - all powered individually by little 24V power supplies, wasting power 24/7...

I can't even.

[–] 1 pt

The best was when they started putting gardens and plants on top of roofs and overhangs. No one wanted to maintain any of it, so it became an eyesore quickly.