Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

This was made and broadcast during one of the online Orthodox Christian church services I work with. This particular video was broadcast to 4.3k subscribers and sub count went up instead of down. Just interesting is all.

*Yes, I know the speakers voice I used for this and have had 2 run ins with Pastor John Hagee in real life. I believe him to be an incredible POS that encapsulates almost everything wrong w/ the current state of Christianity w/ in America. Regardless of my feelings toward Pastor Hagee, this was part of my social project of using items from people not centered around NSDAP ideology and flipping it around to use as propaganda for the "Right."

*circa 2016

This was made and broadcast during one of the online Orthodox Christian church services I work with. This particular video was broadcast to 4.3k subscribers and sub count went up instead of down. Just interesting is all. *Yes, I know the speakers voice I used for this and have had 2 run ins with Pastor John Hagee in real life. I believe him to be an incredible POS that encapsulates almost everything wrong w/ the current state of Christianity w/ in America. Regardless of my feelings toward Pastor Hagee, this was part of my social project of using items from people not centered around NSDAP ideology and flipping it around to use as propaganda for the "Right." *circa 2016

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

socialism is cringe :/

[–] • 3 pts

I completely agree, though anyone that has either read the tenets of NSDAP or Mein Kampf would know that National Socialism is not Socialism. It really is that simple.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

And if you had bothered to do some research you would have found that the Christianity promoted by the NSDAP is unlike any we have today.

Hitler rejected the Jewish-written parts of the Bible (including the entire Old Testament), Claimed "Aryanhood" and non-Jewishness for Christ and promoted the political objective of national unity, to overcome confessional differences, to eliminate Catholicism, and to unite Protestantism into a single unitary Positive Christian church

If any of you Negative Christians were willing to take up Positive Christianity and promote that instead then I could be on board.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Religion should be understood through the lenses of dogma and crusader idealogy. It should be seen as a mechanistic thing, encompassing society, culture, economics, and politics, before faith.

The motto should be, for anyone serious about faith all within the faith, nothing and no-one outside it. As it is in heaven, so be it on earth.

Fanatacism creates soldiers, both of the social variety (necessary for 'housekeeping', aka ostracism of the unfit, and soldiers in the sense that people fear to attack the faith.)

Without which, faith is suppressed.

The far future, assuming humanity doesn't war itself back into the stone age, will either be a completely atheistic bureaucracy, or an utterly theocratic aristocracy. These are the only two models (totalitarianism of the stalinist, or papist variety) that have been shown to work over the span of 1500-2000 years for sustaining empires. And there can be no doubt that if globalism is imperialism, that they must resort to either oppressive atheism, or suffocating fatwa-like rulership.

Republics and democracies do not scale to billions of people.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Then why even call it national socialism? Just call it nationalism you fucking retards...

[–] • 0 pt

Yup. NatSoc is a high school pipe dream; this thread is a perfect example of why it wouldn't work even in a homogenous society.

[–] • 1 pt

He is raising the wrong arm.

[–] • 0 pt

\o

I don't know how so many people fuck this up..

[–] • 0 pt

Maybe it was a view from behind, I cand not tell with stick figures.

[–] • 2 pts

Quite a few rare photos in here. Worth a look even if you feel you have to mute it to get through it.

[–] • 1 pt

Trying to push socialism is the absolute gayest thing a person can possibly do outside of getting eiffel towered

[–] • 1 pt

at least do it right \o

[–] • 0 pt

that looks like i'm viewing a salute and not performing the salute.

[–] • 0 pt

If I HEIL you, I am facing you........... \o ..........With my right arm raised.

Like this.....o/.......I am facing AWAY from you. Why is this so hard for so many people to understand? https://collections.ushmm.org/iiif-b/assets/702390

[–] • 0 pt

I'm just explaining that when I view \o it looks like someone heiling me and when I see o/ it looks like im heiling. Didn't realize there was a shadow council setting rules on this sort of thing.

[–] • 0 pt

I've always seen it both ways

[–] • 1 pt

\o

I am facing you, right arm raised. Only this way can I Heil you properly. \o

[–] • 0 pt

Ah, I get it. I will switch it up, then. \o

[–] • 1 pt

National Socialism will NEVER be a christian movement until the devoted jew lapdogs (be they preachers, churches or entire denominations) are purged. Until then, the lapdogs will always be at best a disruptive force, and at worst a fifth column.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Incorrect that it's any form of Christianity that you Negative-Christians believe in

https://infogalactic.com/info/Positive_Christianity

In 1937, Hans Kerrl, the Nazi Minister for Church Affairs, explained "Positive Christianity" as not "dependent upon the Apostle's Creed", nor in "faith in Christ as the son of God", upon which Christianity relied, but rather, as being represented by the Nazi Party: "The Fuehrer is the herald of a new revelation", he said. To accord with Nazi antisemitism, Positive Christianity advocates also sought to deny the Semitic origins of Christ and the Bible. In such elements Positive Christianity separated itself from Christianity and is considered apostasy by Catholics and Protestants.

Adherents of Positive Christianity argued that traditional Christianity emphasised the passive rather than the active aspects of Christ's life, stressing his miraculous birth, his suffering, his sacrifice on the cross and other-worldly redemption. They wanted to replace this doctrine with a "positive" emphasis on Christ as an active preacher, organizer and fighter who opposed the institutionalized Judaism of his day. At various points in the Nazi regime, attempts were made to replace conventional Christianity with its "positive" alternative.

Positive Christianity differed from orthodox Christianity in that Positive Christianity:

1.Rejected the Jewish-written parts of the Bible (including the entire Old Testament)

2.Claimed "Aryanhood" and non-Jewishness for Christ

3.Promoted the political objective of national unity, to overcome confessional differences, to eliminate Catholicism, and to unite Protestantism into a single unitary Positive Christian church

Edit: I would happily promote this version of Christianity though.

[–] • 1 pt

Sorry for such a late reply, and I want to start by saying that I agree with you on so many well made points. I consider myself more aligned w/ Orthodox teachings, simply bc those are the in real life groups, I am able to commune w/ on a bi weekly basis for more than a decade. That does not mean I disagree w/ you at all. Thank you for such a well thought out reply

[–] • 0 pt

So you would happily promote this? Do you believe it, or is it simply positive/ constructive in your opinion?

[–] • 0 pt

I've already taken the steps to start practicing it. We need to unify under an ideology and there is no better alternative than this imo.

[–] • 0 pt

Why the need to reject the old testament? Does that mean you only accept the new testament in part, or with an everpresent "understanding"?