Maybe. Maybe not. I'm not calling cry babies pussies, I don't give a fuck what faggits do. But the science says crying costs you respect irrevocably and yet the popular propaganda is literally the opposite.
Before we can ever hope to explore if there are exceptions to the rule we need to figure out how to get jews to stop subverting us.
I'm sure context has much to do with it. If you don't even silently weep as a parent is dying you'd just come off as a sociopath.
I think crying is important, like coughing, etc. But if a person is crying all the time, it means they've got lots of issues they haven't resolved, just like if they're coughing all the time. A father should have his shit together already so he doesn't have a reason to cry. So the science here makes sense. A woman is looking for the best father, not just a male who isn't repressed regarding crying.
Crying is a way to reduce stress. I see it as people who cry too much are imbalanced people with poor ways to cope with their emotions. They're unstable.
If you hit a tragic event where the amount of stress is unbareable, that's okay to use crying to release it. Hearing your parent just died or losing a great pet/best friend is not something most people are prepared to cope with immediately. As long as you aren't milking it and using your bad situation to milk sympathy from others it's fine.
Crying about day-to-day situations or things that most people go through tells me you have no idea how to cope with easy situations laid before you.
Agreed. I think of it on the context of babies and children, where parents try to suppress it, with bad results. A healthy adult (man or woman) won't be encountering situations regularly that are that stressful unless something is wrong in the environment (death of loved one, violent living situation/government, natural disasters).
(post is archived)