A wise man once said | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 2 pts

I have been paying attention to how I respond emotionally to the white kids in the texas uni video above and similar situations.

I have noticed that Joe Rogan has a deceptively powerful way to handle difficult guests. He is always calm and ALWAYS in control I was wondering where that comes from, but it really only comes from one place: strength. He knows that in every interview session he can handle him self with the appropriate amount of force if necessary and that allows him that headspace that you need to keep calm and in control during a conversation that is challenging your core values.

Anyway, I was thinking about how I tend to respond automatically in a few ways and sometimes a lot closer to how Rogan handles difficult conversations. I'm not as good as him but I can handle my own.

One of the response categories I bumped into is literally VISUALIZING kids that are reacting like those kids in the texas uni video above as OUR WHITE KIDS but infected. Literally just visualizing them as being infected with a kind of mind rabies.

The result has been an interesting sense of dispassionate distance, a sense of control over my self in the situation and a deeper understanding of the person I am faced with with a touch of sympathy. I have turned many people over to our side over the years (to one degree or another, it's a long road, not everyone ends up at the finish line but everyone is a lot closer to the finish line and they can never turn back) so I know these kids are salvagable. The core of the infection mechanism, as best as I can understand it, is something like this:

We have a separate subsystem that contains our main personality as an individual.
We have one or many subsystems that contains software (either almost full personalities or partial personalities) that override the subsystem that contains the individual personality software. This subsystem is turn on in group situations and zombifies the host neural network until the host is outside of the group and the group subsystem has time to spool down.

What you find when you talk to these people is that they will tell you they believe one thing when they are in a group and another when they are alone. Now, partially, this is just fear of social consequences of not submitting to their group as well, so it's not as simple as I am describing it. However, what I do know is that if you take that kid out of the group of infected peers, given enough time, you can de-program them simply by changing their group alliance through embedding them in a new peer group.

But, the larger problem is that there are entire cancerous ecosystems of mechanisms in place that keep on metastasizing this mind rabies and it keeps on propagating. As the other poster here mentioned, we need to figure out how to excise these cancerous ecosystems.

I have been paying attention to how I respond emotionally to the white kids in the texas uni video above and similar situations. I have noticed that Joe Rogan has a deceptively powerful way to handle difficult guests. He is always calm and ALWAYS in control I was wondering where that comes from, but it really only comes from one place: strength. He knows that in every interview session he can handle him self with the appropriate amount of force if necessary and that allows him that headspace that you need to keep calm and in control during a conversation that is challenging your core values. Anyway, I was thinking about how I tend to respond automatically in a few ways and sometimes a lot closer to how Rogan handles difficult conversations. I'm not as good as him but I can handle my own. One of the response categories I bumped into is literally VISUALIZING kids that are reacting like those kids in the texas uni video above as OUR WHITE KIDS but infected. Literally just visualizing them as being infected with a kind of mind rabies. The result has been an interesting sense of dispassionate distance, a sense of control over my self in the situation and a deeper understanding of the person I am faced with with a touch of sympathy. I have turned many people over to our side over the years (to one degree or another, it's a long road, not everyone ends up at the finish line but everyone is a lot closer to the finish line and they can never turn back) so I know these kids are salvagable. The core of the infection mechanism, as best as I can understand it, is something like this: * We have a separate subsystem that contains our main personality as an individual. * We have one or many subsystems that contains software (either almost full personalities or partial personalities) that override the subsystem that contains the individual personality software. This subsystem is turn on in group situations and zombifies the host neural network until the host is outside of the group and the group subsystem has time to spool down. What you find when you talk to these people is that they will tell you they believe one thing when they are in a group and another when they are alone. Now, partially, this is just fear of social consequences of not submitting to their group as well, so it's not as simple as I am describing it. However, what I do know is that if you take that kid out of the group of infected peers, given enough time, you can de-program them simply by changing their group alliance through embedding them in a new peer group. But, the larger problem is that there are entire cancerous ecosystems of mechanisms in place that keep on metastasizing this mind rabies and it keeps on propagating. As the other poster here mentioned, we need to figure out how to excise these cancerous ecosystems.

parent
link