Epstein survivor Teresa Helm tells her story, from how she was groomed and manipulated by Ghislaine Maxwell to the abuse she says she suffered at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

This isn't quite right.

In a previous post I explained how the human brain works. Roughly speaking, our brains are huge set of subsystems that have either 1 or a few specialized jobs to do and network together to create the illusion of the whole. The example that I used was that the the individual alone vs in a group. Alone the subsystem that handles the piece of software known as you the individual can operate mostly on its own and without too much interference. But, in a group, the subsystem that handles group oriented behaviours becomes dominant takes over and subsumes (temporarily) the subsystem that handles the piece of software known as you the individual.

You can see this effect in all white people when they are lone vs when in a group. In a group, they become a totally different personality with a totally different value system. We all have been in both situations.

With respect to white male and white female co-evolutionary status, we have to keep in mind that we CO-EVOLVED. White men are not what they are just because of external evolutionary pressures, we are what we are because of white female selection pressures. Similarly, white females are what they are not only because of external evolutionary pressures they are what they are because of white male selection pressures.

We like to think of male and female as a kind of individual, but, we have all been through the relationship gambit. Just like in the above example when one subsystem becomes dominant when in a group situation, we can see the same kind of physiological change when we enter committed relationships with the opposite (white) sex. All the guys here know that when the wheels start turning, you the individual is no longer in control driving this ship. Once that other set of subsystems starts to "like" a white woman, you get that feeling like "oh shit, I'm not going to be able to control this". That is because you cannot. Once a subsystem decides a white female is a good pair bond (and hopefully it is reciprocated) a WHOLE SET of subsystems go online and take total and absolute control over your head space. They are absolutely dominant and parasitically take control over your pre-frontal cortex where that piece of software that you call you the individual sits and totally controls it like a puppet. The same happens to women, with slightly different orientation.

Well, remember the part above where we co-evolved with our women? Now consider that male and female brains and the subsystems they are comprised of co-evolved for survival. These subsystems are not only going online within the individual to control the individuals, they go online within the couple to control the couple. Once you start to see this pattern you can kind of start to think of a bonded couple in a kind of symbiotic stasis ... or even dance. This symbiosis has it's life span and the mechanisms wind through their own cascading side effects including the complexities of the software that you call you fighting for its own survival and fulfillment of its own needs. However, what you should keep in mind is that both the white bonded male and the white bonded female have a set of subsystems in their brains that are co-dependent and need each other in asymetrical ways. We know this because every man here has developed emotions for woman that had none for them, and you all know what it means for those subsystems that started to spin up to have to wind down. It takes time, they do eventually wind down, but it takes a LONG time for that to get back to a stasis point where the pre-frontal cortex is back in charge and you the individual is in control again.

What you see here, and really in porn, is need for the female subsystems for the strong and firm yet kind and considerate leadership role of a male. Young females, paricularly in their very early 20s are HIGHLY HIGHLY susceptible for being taken advantage of by unscrupulous males that know what to look for. In other words, her brain is gearing up and prepping it self and looking for a partner, those subsystems are spooling up for a minimum 20 year commitment to raise kids and go through relationship drama and if a suitable male is not found or the wrong male gets sloted into position for her, these men can then take control and pimp them out.

This is how all men control women. The control is bi-directional of course, but we are talking about what is happening in the video and what is happening in the video is this precise mechanism.

While she is at fault for whoring her self out, I agree, there is a greater and an overalapping set of responsibilities that white men and white civlization owes her. She was failed (if she is white) from the following:

By a weak father.
By a weak white civilization that allows non whites in.
By a weak white men that don't protect their white women.
My weak white men that don't kill pimps of white women.

That is what is going on in that video.

When you guys post nonsense like "women are children" you simultaneously communicate to everyone that not only don't you know what you are talking about, you completely subvert white women from their proper role on our side.

Although, I can understand how a white woman might seem childish if you see the subsystem mechanics at work but don't know how it all works together within the context of the individual (body) and the white bonded pair.

This isn't quite right. In a previous post I explained how the human brain works. Roughly speaking, our brains are huge set of subsystems that have either 1 or a few specialized jobs to do and network together to create the illusion of the whole. The example that I used was that the the individual alone vs in a group. Alone the subsystem that handles the piece of software known as you the individual can operate mostly on its own and without too much interference. But, in a group, the subsystem that handles group oriented behaviours becomes dominant takes over and subsumes (temporarily) the subsystem that handles the piece of software known as you the individual. You can see this effect in all white people when they are lone vs when in a group. In a group, they become a totally different personality with a totally different value system. We all have been in both situations. With respect to white male and white female co-evolutionary status, we have to keep in mind that we CO-EVOLVED. White men are not what they are just because of external evolutionary pressures, we are what we are because of white female selection pressures. Similarly, white females are what they are not only because of external evolutionary pressures they are what they are because of white male selection pressures. We like to think of male and female as a kind of individual, but, we have all been through the relationship gambit. Just like in the above example when one subsystem becomes dominant when in a group situation, we can see the same kind of physiological change when we enter committed relationships with the opposite (white) sex. All the guys here know that when the wheels start turning, you the individual is no longer in control driving this ship. Once that other set of subsystems starts to "like" a white woman, you get that feeling like "oh shit, I'm not going to be able to control this". That is because you cannot. Once a subsystem decides a white female is a good pair bond (and hopefully it is reciprocated) a WHOLE SET of subsystems go online and take total and absolute control over your head space. They are absolutely dominant and parasitically take control over your pre-frontal cortex where that piece of software that you call you the individual sits and totally controls it like a puppet. The same happens to women, with slightly different orientation. Well, remember the part above where we co-evolved with our women? Now consider that male and female brains and the subsystems they are comprised of co-evolved for survival. These subsystems are not only going online within the individual to control the individuals, they go online within the couple to control the couple. Once you start to see this pattern you can kind of start to think of a bonded couple in a kind of symbiotic stasis ... or even dance. This symbiosis has it's life span and the mechanisms wind through their own cascading side effects including the complexities of the software that you call you fighting for its own survival and fulfillment of its own needs. However, what you should keep in mind is that both the white bonded male and the white bonded female have a set of subsystems in their brains that are co-dependent and need each other in asymetrical ways. We know this because every man here has developed emotions for woman that had none for them, and you all know what it means for those subsystems that started to spin up to have to wind down. It takes time, they do eventually wind down, but it takes a LONG time for that to get back to a stasis point where the pre-frontal cortex is back in charge and you the individual is in control again. What you see here, and really in porn, is need for the female subsystems for the strong and firm yet kind and considerate leadership role of a male. Young females, paricularly in their very early 20s are HIGHLY HIGHLY susceptible for being taken advantage of by unscrupulous males that know what to look for. In other words, her brain is gearing up and prepping it self and looking for a partner, those subsystems are spooling up for a minimum 20 year commitment to raise kids and go through relationship drama and if a suitable male is not found or the wrong male gets sloted into position for her, these men can then take control and pimp them out. This is how all men control women. The control is bi-directional of course, but we are talking about what is happening in the video and what is happening in the video is this precise mechanism. While she is at fault for whoring her self out, I agree, there is a greater and an overalapping set of responsibilities that white men and white civlization owes her. She was failed (if she is white) from the following: * By a weak father. * By a weak white civilization that allows non whites in. * By a weak white men that don't protect their white women. * My weak white men that don't kill pimps of white women. That is what is going on in that video. When you guys post nonsense like "women are children" you simultaneously communicate to everyone that not only don't you know what you are talking about, you completely subvert white women from their proper role on our side. Although, I can understand how a white woman might seem childish if you see the subsystem mechanics at work but don't know how it all works together within the context of the individual (body) and the white bonded pair.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

None of this contradicts my point at all, enhances it actually. You rightfully blame white men for the behavior of white women just like you would blame a child's shitheadedness on their parents.

You think no different than me when all is said and done. Women ARE the responsibility of men, women ARE helpless without strong males in their lives. These are facts of life, co-evolved or not.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

This is wrong too.

Women are NOT the responsibility of men. It is something far more subtle and will have to be written about and explored in some other way. What I can say is that the relationship is something akin to a male gorilla leading his troop to new feeding grounds or a military unit leader leading his troops to safety while under fire from the enemy. It's somewhere in that ballpark where the leader is meaningless without the troops and the troops survival is dependent on the competence of the troop leadership.

Neither the woman, nor the troops nor the gorilla harem are actual responsibilities of the lead male. It just isn't the correct analogy at all.

More to the point, I have been working with some VERY wealthy and successful female entrepreneurs over the last few years. While they are all women, they all lead poorly and all of our usual critiques can be made of them, NEVER underestimate the power of a woman. I have been forced to come to the conclusion, much like my general derisive tone of your statements, is that men have a leadership role but it is a much more complicated and sophisticated relationship. Instead, a woman is NOT the responsibility of a man, a woman is THE MOST VALUABLE ASSET AND TEAM MEMBER that a man can have. The women that I have completed work for really opened up my eyes to how competent and skilled in some unreal ways women can be.

While the man has a leadership role, the leadership role is not that of a parent taking care of a toddler. It is far closer to a competent leader of a military unit leading his troops to safety. A leader of a unit is important, but only as important as his competence and can be removed from leadership (plus or minus some discretion for the analogy not being a perfect way to explain what is going on) with the discretion of their team members.

When a white man undervalues his white woman for her rightful role as part of the fighting force of his tribe he undermines his own tribes strength.

This is wrong too. Women are NOT the responsibility of men. It is something far more subtle and will have to be written about and explored in some other way. What I can say is that the relationship is something akin to a male gorilla leading his troop to new feeding grounds or a military unit leader leading his troops to safety while under fire from the enemy. It's somewhere in that ballpark where the leader is meaningless without the troops and the troops survival is dependent on the competence of the troop leadership. Neither the woman, nor the troops nor the gorilla harem are actual responsibilities of the lead male. It just isn't the correct analogy at all. More to the point, I have been working with some VERY wealthy and successful female entrepreneurs over the last few years. While they are all women, they all lead poorly and all of our usual critiques can be made of them, NEVER underestimate the power of a woman. I have been forced to come to the conclusion, much like my general derisive tone of your statements, is that men have a leadership role but it is a much more complicated and sophisticated relationship. Instead, a woman is NOT the responsibility of a man, a woman is THE MOST VALUABLE ASSET AND TEAM MEMBER that a man can have. The women that I have completed work for really opened up my eyes to how competent and skilled in some unreal ways women can be. While the man has a leadership role, the leadership role is not that of a parent taking care of a toddler. It is far closer to a competent leader of a military unit leading his troops to safety. A leader of a unit is important, but only as important as his competence and can be removed from leadership (plus or minus some discretion for the analogy not being a perfect way to explain what is going on) with the discretion of their team members. When a white man undervalues his white woman for her rightful role as part of the fighting force of his tribe he undermines his own tribes strength.

parent
link