Bad BOT. Other passengers did not complain. It was only the stewardess. She didn't even state that he was removed because of the statement. Only that he did not "follow instructions". Polls prove it is more likely the majority of passengers support Lets Go Brandon. One offended person does not make something patently offensive. BLM is actually racist and patently offensive, but it was defended as free speech. Conservatives understand that free speech means that sometimes you will be offended but in the pursuit if happiness, someones else's right to their own opinion is more important.
Stop moving the goalposts you slimy jew rat. We're not talking about what's free speech or what's popular. We're talking about whether it's a breach of contract to remove a passenger from a flight because of something they're wearing. The answer is NO, it is not a breach of contract. End of story. The passenger has no case.
It is a breach of contract because "Lets Go Brandon" is not Patently Offensive. It is on bumper stickers, t-shirts, flags, social media, TV Advertisements, etc. Anyone with a bar card knows that breach of contract is the basis of the suit as it allows for punitive damages. Allegiant's Insurance company will press to settle as there is no way they let this go to a jury.
It is a breach of contract because "Lets Go Brandon" is not Patently Offensive
You'll never give up because you're so juvenile you can't stand to be wrong. You'll argue that it wasn't you that ate the cookies from the cookie jar with crumbs on your face and everything. The contract is very specific that if the airline or any passengers feel that something another passenger is wearing is offensive the airline can request that they remove it, and if they refuse the airline can remove them from the flight. End of story. There's no arguing it. There's no way around it. The contract is air tight.
(post is archived)