Not in this case. This is a public space. The fact it's owned it irrelevant. No one can legally prevent you from recording in a public space. To do so is a violation of rights. Likewise, they cannot demand you end your first amendment right to express yourself in a public space.
Private ownership does not determine if it's public or not.
Na that plane is private property, the airport is private property. The street outside the airport is public.
Private ownership does not determine if it's public or not.
Where ya live bro? Its now public.
Learn the law. You are completely wrong.
My home is not a public space you idiot. An airport and plane is a public space. The security area is a federal security area and has been granted special protection and exemption.
This is why, for example, you can legally exercise your second amendment rights in most airport lobbies but not in the federal security area. Public space vs exemption.
You both are idiots.
An airport and plane is a public space
Privately OWNED by a PRIVATE party the AIR PORT.
Ex Security fuck try to walk on a tarmac please. See what happens. You will be TRESSPASSED off private property. BTW the State and CIty have PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Bro, I used to get people like you arrested daily. Why? Because I was PAID to secure PRIVATE PROPERTY. That was city owned.
This is why, for example, you can legally exercise your second amendment rights in most airport lobbies but not in the federal security area. Public space vs exemption.
Up till TSA you can. However you just admited there are public and PRIVATE on Air Port Property. Try to Open Carry on a plane.
A private airplane is not a public space. You have to purchase tickets to be there. That makes it not even quasi-public.
(post is archived)