Stop moving the goalposts you slimy jew rat. We're not talking about what's free speech or what's popular. We're talking about whether it's a breach of contract to remove a passenger from a flight because of something they're wearing. The answer is NO, it is not a breach of contract. End of story. The passenger has no case.
It is a breach of contract because "Lets Go Brandon" is not Patently Offensive. It is on bumper stickers, t-shirts, flags, social media, TV Advertisements, etc. Anyone with a bar card knows that breach of contract is the basis of the suit as it allows for punitive damages. Allegiant's Insurance company will press to settle as there is no way they let this go to a jury.
It is a breach of contract because "Lets Go Brandon" is not Patently Offensive
You'll never give up because you're so juvenile you can't stand to be wrong. You'll argue that it wasn't you that ate the cookies from the cookie jar with crumbs on your face and everything. The contract is very specific that if the airline or any passengers feel that something another passenger is wearing is offensive the airline can request that they remove it, and if they refuse the airline can remove them from the flight. End of story. There's no arguing it. There's no way around it. The contract is air tight.
"An ad hominem attack is a logical fallacy employed when one cannot or will not discuss the issue at hand; they can be seen in a majority of social media debates regarding politics or religion. When asked about these tactics, most people will decry them, and claim that sticking to facts and reason is the way in which they engage in debate" Burn Loot Murder caused over $2 billion in damages to mostly black communities, yet wearing a BLM mask will not get you kicked off a plane as being patently offensive. You refused to accept that no passengers complained. The stewardess was personally politically offended.
(post is archived)