I did read the contract. I am the one that gave it to you. "Lets Go Brandon" is a legitimate political statement that is not "patently offensive" that is the basis of the breach of contract suit. Even BLM an organization responsible for billions in damage and hundreds of murders including police officers is not considered patently offensive.
Lets Go Brandon" is a legitimate political statement that is not "patently offensive" that is the basis of the breach of contract suit.
So how were you able to determine that it wasn't patently offensive to any other passenger on the plane? Because the contract says if it is, then they can refuse service.
is not determined by an individual who is offended. It is determined by the general viewing public. is not obviously offensive, . Neither the stewardess or Allegiant claimed this was because he was being offensive. They only stated it was because he did not follow mask policy.
Patently offensive is not determined by an individual who is offended
The contract literally says it is determined by the person who's offended. This isn't a statute. Contracts are not interpreted according to rules of statutory construction. Even if they were, all the airline has to do is fall back to F1, which states they can remove anybody whose conduct is "offensive" or is known to be offensive in the past. That leaves the determination of what's offensive to the discretion of the airline. There's zero chance of a successful legal case against the airline for breach of contract.
(post is archived)