If something doesn't apply at the limits, it's not logically sound. Doesn't matter if you think it's dishonest or not. You might want to look into why you are disregarding logic to fit your assumptions of how things should work.
"If something doesn't apply at the limits, it's not logically sound."
Thats just the slippery slope in disguise. Try again.
Better yet, why shouldn't you be able to carry a rocket launcher on a commercial flight?
You're free to argue the rules should apply even in the absurd case, and I'm free to argue thats exactly besides the point of having rules and standards to begin with.
It defeats the spirit of having rules and regulations. Its to improve things all around.
Mask mandates don't and vaccine mandates, even on planes, don't.
And thats my position. Whats yours?
I don't care about your silly argument with the other guy. I'm just pointing out the validity of his logical construction which you attacked, exposing your deficiency in logical reasoning.
You don't know how to reason logically. There's no point in engaging with you.
You don't know how to reason logically. There's no point in engaging with you.
And thats how I know I've won. You have no argument here.
I am open to you explaining to me why you think I'm not "reasoning logically".
Frankly I think what you and him have written is sophistry.
But I'm willing to hear you out.
(post is archived)