is not determined by an individual who is offended. It is determined by the general viewing public. is not obviously offensive, . Neither the stewardess or Allegiant claimed this was because he was being offensive. They only stated it was because he did not follow mask policy.
Patently offensive is not determined by an individual who is offended
The contract literally says it is determined by the person who's offended. This isn't a statute. Contracts are not interpreted according to rules of statutory construction. Even if they were, all the airline has to do is fall back to F1, which states they can remove anybody whose conduct is "offensive" or is known to be offensive in the past. That leaves the determination of what's offensive to the discretion of the airline. There's zero chance of a successful legal case against the airline for breach of contract.
"The contract literally says it is determined by the person who's offended". No it doesn't. Patently Offensive is a defined term.
What part of
that are deemed patently offensive or obscene by other passengers
is confusing you?
(post is archived)