it's a private business they can do what they want.
Nope, it's a common carrier, and they are prohibited from discrimination based on any class.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/202
It shall be unlawful for any common carrier to make any unjust or unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services for or in connection with like communication service, directly or indirectly, by any means or device, or to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, class of persons, or locality, or to subject any particular person, class of persons, or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.
Chapter 5 applies to wireless or radio communication, not airlines.
Not in this case. This is a public space. The fact it's owned it irrelevant. No one can legally prevent you from recording in a public space. To do so is a violation of rights. Likewise, they cannot demand you end your first amendment right to express yourself in a public space.
Private ownership does not determine if it's public or not.
Na that plane is private property, the airport is private property. The street outside the airport is public.
Private ownership does not determine if it's public or not.
Where ya live bro? Its now public.
Learn the law. You are completely wrong.
My home is not a public space you idiot. An airport and plane is a public space. The security area is a federal security area and has been granted special protection and exemption.
This is why, for example, you can legally exercise your second amendment rights in most airport lobbies but not in the federal security area. Public space vs exemption.
A private airplane is not a public space. You have to purchase tickets to be there. That makes it not even quasi-public.
(post is archived)