Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Was not looking for this...any idea the context of this interview (when, where, by whom)? Is it recent or totally out of context?

I know many are saying people are trying to cover their ass but I don't get the sense that they actually think they are loosing. Admitting the clot shot does not work, in my mind, would just be part of the plan. They knew it would do this, so now they admit it and the sheep believe and trust them still.

Was not looking for this...any idea the context of this interview (when, where, by whom)? Is it recent or totally out of context? I know many are saying people are trying to cover their ass but I don't get the sense that they actually think they are loosing. Admitting the clot shot does not work, in my mind, would just be part of the plan. They knew it would do this, so now they admit it and the sheep believe and trust them still.

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

This keeps popping up as a new revelation when it was a conversation that he was having with Mark Zuckerberg in March of 2020. It was fact checked by reuters as not being about the COVID-19 vaccine because the conversation predated the vaccine's existence (that we know of). However every coronavirus vaccine in development has failed because of the ADE he's alluding to.

[–] • 4 pts (edited )

Still relevant even if it preceded COVID and was not said about the COVID vaccine. At some point Fauci decided that he represented science and no longer needed to base his opinions on data.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The Q-tards keep digging up old shit and presenting it as some new revelation. They are just as bad as the fake main stream media with their manufactured fake BS news.

[–] • 2 pts

Invariably it is new to someone downstream or refreshes conversations about certain things that have been memory holed. While not productive, it is still useful.

[–] • 1 pt

Sand is useful, however when it is generously and liberally (hehe) sprayed into ones eyes, it becomes counterproductive. Same difference. Qtards exist to obfuscate the truth.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Taken out of context, it has no use at all.

[–] • 2 pts

At best, he only sees people as petri dishes. There is no humanity.

[–] • 2 pts

The vaxtards are the test.

[–] • 0 pt

paradoxically made people worse

This is an issue of hubris. Things we make aren't even necessarily vaccines, or medicine. They are chemicals, concoctions of molecules. Most things are harmful to humans. Even with testing we can't be sure something is beneficial. So these aren't even necessarily vaccines (or cures), so the paradox is only in the imaginary world where we are infallible. If it harms people, it was never a cure or medicine; it was a poison all along.