Have you ever seen one of the many videos showing how graphene reacts to electric fields?
All molecules react to electric/magnetic fields. Why would 5g be different than 4g or 3g or WiFi or radar or radio? 5g (UHF) waves cannot penetrate past your dermis without being extremely focused. ELF waves are much more problematic to humans and it is literally everywhere. 5g/graphene is a distraction.
In the video they use nanotubes, which are not and have not been found in the vaxx. Graphene is 1 atom thick you cannot see it without an electron microscope. If any of the videos about graphene in the vaxx are true, they are all small particles of graphene. Which are not able to self assemble in that state. Thats why nanotubes are so special, because they can self assemble.
All the other videos that show "graphene" reacting to phones and whatnot are fake. The signal is always there, it would not take a phone call to set it off.
Instead of googling "muh 5g danger", try searching for actual info about the topic by its real name, not its brand name. UHF or even millimeter waves. There is and has been lots of info out there about both subjects. Problem is people only search what they are told to search and it wasnt an issue for anyone until they were told it was.
"Instead of googling "muh 5g danger"
"Problem is people only search what they are told to search and it wasnt an issue for anyone until they were told it was."
This is how shills talk folks. They spew lies and derogatory like they are facts and show no proof.
I said UHF. I should have said EHF. Still I said no lies.
Go watch some more YouTube you fucking NEET
This is how shills talk folks. They spew lies and derogatory like they are facts and show no proof.
Name one lie. Explicitly. Word for word. Its not my job to educate you. You are more than capable of doing your own research. And that does not include watching spoon fed YouTube videos.
"And that does not include watching spoon fed YouTube videos." More shill talk. The truth isn't on your side that's why all you got is derogatory.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/ https://scientists4wiredtech.com/ https://www.brighteon.com/e599ddb5-eecd-4746-955d-acd5ccb6d2e6 https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7022311526.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0ArKewlx1A&t=133s "Dr Anthony Miller "That if IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) were to re-evaluate Radio frequency radiation, It would be placed in Class 1 I.E a human carcinogenic"
5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam-forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, known as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures.
"The WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer has just issued it’s decision that non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation is classified as a 2B (Possible) Carcinogen. This is the same category as DDT, lead, and engine exhaust." <<That is from 2011.
Don't forget The Moscow Signal.
(post is archived)