I only get paid to post for you sweetheart.
My stance is that a signal strength of less than what a consumer WiFi router puts out isn't going to hurt you, unless you live in it for your entire life, and then - only maybe. My stance is also that there is radio all around you, from 10KHz navigation beacons all the way up to 32GHz RADAR devices, and higher depending on where you are. Are you sick? You should be, you're constantly being bombarded with radio of field strengths higher than what you purport to be dangerous. Live near an airport? There's probably half a megawatt bombarding the local area.
You can dance around this all you like, but the fact of the matter is you can't even tell me what bands you're worried about and what they're supposed to do because you're just parroting something someone told you, and all you can do is insult me when I tell ask you to explain why you think this. You've given me no evidence to the contrary, and all of your papers simply repeat the same tired facts that simply say what we already know - that radio emissions can cause problems with people.
So, if that low of a field strength causes people's eyes to bleed, then why aren't the people living near airports just bursting into flames? Why aren't the people living near KNX in Los Angeles, a radio station so powerful you can receive it on a coil of wire and a speaker, just exploding into dust? Why doesn't your body simply vanish every time you drive by a multi-sector cellular antenna?
Your reply is going to be similar to that of 's replies. You're simply going to insult me like you have, you're not going to give me any evidence (or what you do will be those very institutions you claim broke my mind,) and you're going to just whine about how bad I'm being to you.
My field strength meter is somewhere in this mess, but I don't feel like digging it out.
There's enough RF generating equipment there to burn your mind in half.
The whole point was to show it does damage....and you're agreeing. So why are we arguing?
I never said that RF didn't do damage, in fact I pointed it out in my first or second post which you didn't read at all you simply jumped on the whine wagon and complained.
I said that "the field strength that the Moscow Signal was registering was too low to cause damage - a consumer WiFi router puts out more power." You're getting more non-ionizing radio frequency radiation just standing outside at night from all the AM stations that are skipping in the atmosphere.
You are comparing apples to oranges. The wavelength from AM is huge compared to Wi-fi and cell phones. The shorter the wave length the greater the danger.
You should stopping whining already, i almost feel bad for you.
(post is archived)