Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 8 pts

Doesn’t that seem like a ruse to get people to think eight months itself is not unreasonable? Careers are on the line, and people are dying of myocarditis and cardiac arrest. If somebody wasn’t putting scissors to the judge’s balls, he would’ve made it one month.

[–] • 4 pts

Yeah, give it a few months. They'll somehow reverse this. Everyone will have forgotten about it by then.

[–] • 0 pt

The records are electronic. They should be available immediately.

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

I feel like this is a negotiation tactic straight out of Donald trumps playbook. In negotiations you always ask for a ridiculous initial ask(75years) knowing that you won’t get that. When they give you eight months, the opposition feels like they won but you really got what you wanted. In eight months I would expect people to be dying left and right from the vaccine and the info release time period is irrelevant.

[–] • 2 pts

Very good point. Buckle up, this is going to be a weird year…

[–] • 0 pt

That makes a lot of sense and is terrifying.

[–] • 3 pts

Eight months is much more reasonable than 75 years, unless you have something to hide.

[–] • 2 pts

They basically admitted that they never read the data to begin with. That should have started riots and regulatory reform. Instead everyone is proven once again to be stupid pussies.

[–] • 1 pt

Cant you just link to the source? i dont have 26 min to listen to some guy talk about shit that i could read in a few minutes myself.

I kept hearing that there were millions of lines of text for the whole thing and they could only manage a certain amount per month and that it would take 80 years just to print it all. Bullshit no doubt, but if that was their excuse nothing will change that.

[–] • 0 pt

Not Pfizer the CDC. Your tax dollars are being used to protect Pfizer from you.