I think it comes down to is being a war crime to use WMDs against civilians. For as much as the west has pushed anti-WMD rhetoric it is interesting that the USA and Israel are basically the only developed nations that have a very long, thorough and consistent track record fo doing exactly that.
Whether its white phosphorus or flechette bombs or chemical weapons that liquify your kidneys in 5 days, it really doesn't matter. Its still something that should get more attention than some tranny being called Sir. When it doesn't it makes everyone claiming the moral high ground look like a fucking retard asshole.
I think it comes down to is being a war crime to use WMDs against civilians.
Let's be clear on something. Artillery, firing conventional munitions, is not a "WMD". And what was pictured in that video were clearly artillery HE submunitions. Not WP or "WMD"s by any stretch of the imagination.
It can be used that way, if used to fire nuclear, chemical or biological munitions which are, by the very definition "WMD"s.
If people want to start stretching the definition of what constitutes a chemical weapon to try and include WP, even though it's use historically is as an obscurant (the rounds are even clearly marked "SMOKE") and as an incendiary, they can do that. But that doesn't make it so.
Whether its white phosphorus or flechette bombs or chemical weapons that liquify your kidneys in 5 days, it really doesn't matter.
That's just it. Yes, it does matter. Words have specific meanings for a reason. For clear and precise communication. That's why WP and flechettes are NOT classified as "WMD"s, and chemical weapons ARE. When you start obfuscating the language and stretching the definitions of things based on what you don't like, to include and attempt to associate them with other things that you don't like, you start to sound like a jew.
it is interesting that the USA and Israel are basically the only developed nations that have a very long, thorough and consistent track record fo doing exactly that.
And it is just as interesting that in Rwanda they used machetes, axes and hammers the kill thousands in days. The total body count in the end was higher than Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Where was your righteous indignation then? Is it okay just because they're niggers? Or is it okay because they're not the United States? You want to reclassify home hardware as WMD's now? The local Home Depot as a merchant of WMD's?
Okay cool, to show that you truly believe what you claim please submit the names and addresses of all of your family and friends so that I can "Target" them with artillery strikes at random times in the next month.
It's not a war crime, not a WMD, other countries do it and you don't bat an eye so you'd only object if you're a hypocrite and a complete tool.
I'll wait for your decision.
Saints and ministers of grace, defend us all from yet another internet tough guy. Now go upstairs to the kitchen and tell your mom it's time for your meds again sunshine.
The local Home Depot as a merchant of WMD's?
Only gun grabbers think the weapon is the problem. The problem is in how it's used, and that requires a person. Using artillery against legitimate military targets is one thing. Targeting residential neighborhoods is a war crime, like the allied bombings of Dresden and Tokyo, or the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
(post is archived)