If anything, this is a great example of how easily lawmakers bend over to the will of large corporations. It's ironic to say that it's a TFR because it's been effect since 2003 and has become somewhat permanent. And I'll be honest, I see no good reason for a No-Fly Zone over their park, especially when other theme parks don't get the same thing.
If anything, this is a great example of how easily lawmakers bend over to the will of large corporations. It's ironic to say that it's a TFR because it's been effect since 2003 and has become somewhat permanent. And I'll be honest, I see no good reason for a No-Fly Zone over their park, especially when other theme parks don't get the same thing.
(post is archived)