WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

463

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Ahh, i see you have decided to concede and refrain from anymore of your MSM 'fact checked' propaganda'. So you do stand by your inferring that 'Long term studies don't need the follow up monitoring to gather and record the long term study data'. Wow. Clearly you would ignore that you are also incorrect and that Pfizer does list 'Blood Clots' as a known safety signal in the Pfizer Vaccine literature. Same with you omitting the Japan safety data of 40x more risk to the young after Pfizer vaccination. Not good faith.

For all your talk of CCP propaganda - you are guilty of wilfully pushing the exact same nonsense for Pfizer and the MSM.

You lot are good at copy pasting 'fact checked' obfuscating nonsense and then use it to circle-jerk support your erroneous claims, it simply takes someone who is wise on how one can 'incorrectly' use data to support whatever narrative ones wants. Ergo, 'Absolute IFR etc vs Relative Cases and your ridiculous use of State by State snapshot data' is a rookie mistake showing you are either not aware and ignorant of how data can be misinterpreted using those parameters or are purposely pushing a narrative and Wholly Deceptive. Shame on you, lol. Get outer here, shill.