I've never seen the answer to that question in the last video, what did the speaker say in response? What I've noticed is that people on the far right set a line which, if crossed, they say they will trigger the revolution. But the establishment just ignored them and crosses that line without hesitation. So then the far right, instead of making good on their word to loose the dogs of war, just draws yet another line, but further ahead from where where find themselves that time. The process repeats infinitely, we set boundaries, but do not enforce them, so when others violate the limits we set for them, we refuse to act on our threats of consequences. This is made worse by placating gestures from the system, they make a big issue of some unimportant event, then hand us a phyrric victory there, while at the same time they secure multiple more important victories in the background while we are distracted. They also set us up with hopium, telling us that all we have to do to win, is do nothing that could actually threaten the system, in fact, these shepards tell us, we are winning already, and it only appears to be that we are losing, because all our victories are happening in the shadows. Then there are those who look at the tactics of the enemy, and reject them, they rationalize all sorts of noble or practical sounding reasons, but in actuality, it's because they know resorting to these tactics are both difficult and risky, it takes many attempts attempts secure successes, and most who do not find success will see themselves punished by the establishment for their actions. We all want to be the one to bell the cat, but none of us wants to be one of the mice who get eaten in the attempt, it is thus attractive to pretend as though the idea of belling the cat was a bad one, and use those of us who the cat has eaten as proof of the foolishness of the plan, but it is a good plan, in fact, the cat must be belled if the mice are to survive. We this have yet another set of shephards leading us to the slow but nonetheless deadly jaws of nowhere, they will say to just spread information, as if it's mere knowledge alone that will save us all, without any need for action. Worse, it also provides an impossible mission of convincing the majority of people to first care about controversial topics in the first place, which are only of interest to a niche part of the population to begin with, and then to take the most controversial stance on that issue, the anti establishmentarian stance, at great cost to their personal lives, especially given how scary these sorts of opinions are and the general public, who are conflict averse in general, but even more so when the opponent is the very system they live under and depend upon. There also a large group of people who are straight up morons. Some have moral objections, they believe in some objective and normative morality that applies equally to everyone, even those who would not be retarded enough to extend the same courtesy to them in return. Some are opposed to using physical force to resolve ideological conflicts, feeling as though doing anything short of using words to persuade others into adopting a compatible worldview is somehow admitting your ideas are wrong. Some are religious imbeciles, who think that God and Jesus are against the use of force to resist oppression, or that God will solve everything if they keep the faith, or that it doesn't matter what happens on Earth if they they to heaven, some of the last category even go so far as to consider themselves as martyrs for the faith and that in a way, their willingness to suffer under oppression is a test of their loyalty to what they see as being God's plan for them as long suffering Christians. Some are slaves to public approval, they want to wait until everyone is suffering immensely and all the leftards are finally understanding the poison of their ideas to make a move, because the idea of being considered villains is uncomfortable to them, they want their rebellion to be like in the stories to by media jews, where the rebels are seen as unimpeachably good and the empire is completely despised by all, even those who work for it. There a ton of other such objections, from all sorts of groups, If only they put as much thought into effective rebellion as they did into coming up with a rationale as to why not to rebel effectively.