WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

A failure of communism, not nuclear energy

we'd be further along the road to sustainable energy if it wasn't for the fear this created, and Merkel pointlessly cancelling all nuclear power stations

[–] 3 pts

Nuclear power is safe and worth it. The people who are against it have other motives.

[–] 1 pt

Yes, super heated boiled water for steam combusted electrical generation is amazing goy. Build back better for pennies on the dollar ....

[–] 1 pt

All because a nuclear submarine captain wanted to prove himself to the politik.

[–] 0 pt

They would've done that anyway, the KKKommieKKKrats don't really want "sustainable" anything, that's just a communist buzzword.

[–] -1 pt (edited )

'sustainable' is what every rational person wants

it doesn't matter how we get there or how much of a gravy train the democrats will ride along the way, it still has to happen

Trump behaved like a moron for creating the idea that it's somehow a 'bad thing', rather than a 'difficult thing that needs managing' Trump has no long term picture

[–] 2 pts

Speak for yourself.

Fuck "sustainable" and the rest of your socialcommunistic bullshit.

What do you consider "sustainable"? Electric cars? Solar power? Wind? NONE of these things are "sustainable".

[–] 0 pt

Anti nuke propaganda was bolsheviks propaganda from cold war

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Remember when communism fucked up Fukushima?

[–] 0 pt

That was a natural disaster, level 9 earthquakes are rare, that was japan's first I think?