theyre not liberal. Theyre evil and they have an agenda and theyre taking over this country
theyre not liberal. Theyre evil and they have an agenda and theyre taking over this country
Holy SHIT
Holy SHIT
She's clearly a jew. Look at that witchy nose.
She's pilpuling, a jew trick they think white people don't know about. They use it to pretend they're smarter than everyone else.
She's clearly a jew. Look at that witchy nose.
She's pilpuling, a jew trick they think white people don't know about. They use it to pretend they're smarter than everyone else.
Sometimes my wife gets pissed off at me, I'll ask her a question and she starts talking and I'll just look at her. Eventually she'll notice my blank look and say 'what?'. I tell her that was a yes or no question and I still don't know what her answer is.
Sometimes my wife gets pissed off at me, I'll ask her a question and she starts talking and I'll just look at her. Eventually she'll notice my blank look and say 'what?'. I tell her that was a yes or no question and I still don't know what her answer is.
You should be questioning judicial nominees. I kept waiting for Kennedy to say "this is a yes or no question".
You should be questioning judicial nominees. I kept waiting for Kennedy to say "this is a yes or no question".
No woman should be a judge-- automatic disqualification. I wonder if his question was based on something she said or wrote?
No woman should be a judge-- automatic disqualification. I wonder if his question was based on something she said or wrote?
That’s the feeling I got too, but I don’t know for sure
That’s the feeling I got too, but I don’t know for sure
What a fuck is wrong with this cunt? It is closed straightforward question where you have to answer yer or no. This bitch must be beaten, raped by gang of sandniggers and thrown into the kitchen with her burka on. Maybe this way she will learn how not to behave like embarrassing obnoxious bitch.
What a fuck is wrong with this cunt? It is closed straightforward question where you have to answer yer or no. This bitch must be beaten, raped by gang of sandniggers and thrown into the kitchen with her burka on. Maybe this way she will learn how not to behave like embarrassing obnoxious bitch.
She's going to be sending white people to jail for thought crimes.
She's going to be sending white people to jail for thought crimes.
It's for the common good
It's for the common good
This is a perfect example of why women should be beaten and raped!
This is a perfect example of why women should be beaten and raped!
Right because you want your daughter raped or wife by some coonboon....
Right because you want your daughter raped or wife by some coonboon....
Right because you believe this woman doesn't represent the majority of women judges...
Right because you believe this woman doesn't represent the majority of women judges...
I have no idea. However i dont think every woman judge has a signature line antifa throwing brick with her name on it.
I have no idea. However i dont think every woman judge has a signature line antifa throwing brick with her name on it.
It's as if the very idea of telling the truth is this terrifying new concept that she's worried might be habit-forming.
It's as if the very idea of telling the truth is this terrifying new concept that she's worried might be habit-forming.
This exactly
This exactly
She's in a tight spot, where it would be seriously wrong to not answer truthfully and to demand a "yes/no" answer to that question is generally unfair..
I'm missing context on this; "Social justice" is a complicated term to define, not least in a legal perspective, but i'm getting "free niggers because poor niggers"-vibes is what's meant here..
@ 4:30 she comes close to answering (correctly imo), something along the lines of 'un-biased process is paramount and SJ needs to be viewed from case-specific and individualistic POV whether to be relevant or not'..
However, it looks jewish and therefore the thing would probably be of better use in israel..
She's in a tight spot, where it would be seriously wrong to *not* answer truthfully and to demand a "yes/no" answer to that question is generally unfair..
I'm missing context on this; "Social justice" is a complicated term to define, not least in a legal perspective, but i'm getting "free niggers because poor niggers"-vibes is what's meant here..
@ 4:30 she comes close to answering (correctly imo), something along the lines of 'un-biased process is paramount and SJ needs to be viewed from case-specific and individualistic POV whether to be relevant or not'..
However, it looks jewish and therefore the thing would probably be of better use in israel..
Do you think a judge should have the opinion that criminal actions should be forgiven for the sake of social justice?
It shouldn’t be a complicated answer at all
Do you think a judge should have the opinion that criminal actions should be forgiven for the sake of social justice?
It shouldn’t be a complicated answer at all
Short "yes/no" answer: no..
Longer answer: possibly yes..
Even longer answer: It's definitely case specific, whether it should weigh in on sentencing, as "social justice" may well be proven in a court of law, to have had influence on a persons "skillset" and therefore impacting ability/capability to navigate society..
SJ basically have nothing to do with race, but the concept have definitely been hijacked by people wanting to twist it into certain uses.
Example: some negro without a criminal record (pls use your imagination) loots goods from say Armani worth $800 vs some poor negro (possibly with prior crimes) burglarizes food for the same amount of money, because documented unfortunate situation and resulting hunger..
I'd advocate leniency in sentencing for the latter, on basis of social justice.
Why use negroes as examples? Because negroes appear before US judges statistically more often (percentage of race total head-count caught doing criminal acts) than any other race..
Short "yes/no" answer: no..
Longer answer: possibly yes..
Even longer answer: It's definitely case specific, whether it should weigh in on sentencing, as "social justice" may well be proven in a court of law, to have had influence on a persons "skillset" and therefore impacting ability/capability to navigate society..
SJ basically have nothing to do with race, but the concept have definitely been hijacked by people wanting to twist it into certain uses.
Example: some negro without a criminal record (pls use your imagination) loots goods from say Armani worth $800 vs some poor negro (possibly with prior crimes) burglarizes food for the same amount of money, because documented unfortunate situation and resulting hunger..
I'd advocate leniency in sentencing for the latter, on basis of social justice.
Why use negroes as examples?
Because negroes appear before US judges statistically more often (percentage of race total head-count caught doing criminal acts) than any other race..
I don’t think that applying the circumstances to a sentence qualifies as social justice. I think certainly it’s common for judges to take what was stolen and why into account when rendering a verdict. When I hear this senator’s question, I think it’s more like:
Poor negro steals a tv; drop charges because “poor negro.”
Middle class white guy steals the same tv; convicted because “privilege.”
I don’t think that applying the circumstances to a sentence qualifies as social justice. I think certainly it’s common for judges to take what was stolen and why into account when rendering a verdict. When I hear this senator’s question, I think it’s more like:
Poor negro steals a tv; drop charges because “poor negro.”
Middle class white guy steals the same tv; convicted because “privilege.”
(post is archived)