That just means we get to use them at the left when we are in power. Police are supposed to obey.
Police are supposed to obey.
They obey their commanding officers, not any sense of better judgment. Police leadership are the ones telling the rank and file to do this, and most regular cops are fine with it.
when we are in power.
That's not how "democracy" works. They will never relinquish power.
That is how power works. No one wants to relinquish power, you take power from them.
This is done every day all the time.
You're still living under the illusion that the two party system is real, it's only an illusion of separation. And you shouldn't advocate for authoritarianism but the non aggression principle.
All that says is that you have given up, put your hands up and are ready to be shot.
My position is this:
It's a two party system
It's a uni party system
It's a globalist party system
It's all of the above.
I only see possibilities and options to move the chess pieces around. Your assessment of the situation is so poor you wasted my and everyones time writing that down. Not only did you not fully assess the players in the game to any sufficiently high resolution, you did not describe all of the games being played at the same time and you provided exactly ZERO suggestion on what moves can be made beyond the "non agression principle" which our enemy is ignoring every second of every day as they rape 20 000 white women every day and indoctrinate and groom our children for pedophelia and permanent psychological and physical damage by the 100s of thousands.
You sir, are what we all call, a sucker.
You obviously haven't studied the non aggression principle. It doesn't mean to be a cuck but to not initiate force through the government. The non aggression principle does include the right to self defense and using aggression only when necessary to live freely and peacefully.
(post is archived)