You're still living under the illusion that the two party system is real, it's only an illusion of separation. And you shouldn't advocate for authoritarianism but the non aggression principle.
All that says is that you have given up, put your hands up and are ready to be shot.
My position is this:
It's a two party system
It's a uni party system
It's a globalist party system
It's all of the above.
I only see possibilities and options to move the chess pieces around. Your assessment of the situation is so poor you wasted my and everyones time writing that down. Not only did you not fully assess the players in the game to any sufficiently high resolution, you did not describe all of the games being played at the same time and you provided exactly ZERO suggestion on what moves can be made beyond the "non agression principle" which our enemy is ignoring every second of every day as they rape 20 000 white women every day and indoctrinate and groom our children for pedophelia and permanent psychological and physical damage by the 100s of thousands.
You sir, are what we all call, a sucker.
You obviously haven't studied the non aggression principle. It doesn't mean to be a cuck but to not initiate force through the government. The non aggression principle does include the right to self defense and using aggression only when necessary to live freely and peacefully.
I am giving you a bit of a hard time. I appreciate the people here because we get to fight a little bit.
I am working on something right now that has to do figuring out morality, what it is, how to define it and so forth. The non aggression principle is one of the few values that are claimed to be morally universal.
I don't believe that all. Not only is it not universal, it cannot be applied across human species equally, and there are at least 7 human species living side by side on the planet right now in my opinion.
I hold the belief that we need all of our men and women trained to look at the world from a military perspective and a non-agression principle should not be part of that value system because it weakens a civilization. To the extent that I can ever see applying a non-agression principle is to my family, friends and perhaps some of my own species of human. However, I cannot really see how the non-agression principle could be applicable even at the level of my own species because we will always have traitors and collaborators to deal with.
The reality is the people in government always must use government power against your enemies because if you don't your enemies will use it against you.
(post is archived)