You obviously haven't studied the non aggression principle. It doesn't mean to be a cuck but to not initiate force through the government. The non aggression principle does include the right to self defense and using aggression only when necessary to live freely and peacefully.
I am giving you a bit of a hard time. I appreciate the people here because we get to fight a little bit.
I am working on something right now that has to do figuring out morality, what it is, how to define it and so forth. The non aggression principle is one of the few values that are claimed to be morally universal.
I don't believe that all. Not only is it not universal, it cannot be applied across human species equally, and there are at least 7 human species living side by side on the planet right now in my opinion.
I hold the belief that we need all of our men and women trained to look at the world from a military perspective and a non-agression principle should not be part of that value system because it weakens a civilization. To the extent that I can ever see applying a non-agression principle is to my family, friends and perhaps some of my own species of human. However, I cannot really see how the non-agression principle could be applicable even at the level of my own species because we will always have traitors and collaborators to deal with.
The reality is the people in government always must use government power against your enemies because if you don't your enemies will use it against you.
You believe in using government force at your convenience and you also allow others to use that force against you. That doesn't make more sense than the non-aggression principle. It sounds like you're in favor of tyranny and you don't mind which way it goes because you think the tyranny will turn in your favor again one day.
Yes, absolutely. As long as the tyranny allows my people to not only survive but expand I support it. Non aggression principle applies only to my people.
Everyone in the world believes this. Only white people believe non-aggression to be a thing.
Tyranny comes in many flavours. What you or I call tyranny others would not. For example, trannies, gays and pedophiles believe they should be able to use the state to groom our children and then rape them. I believe I should be able to use the state to remove them from civilization.
All non whites believe they should be able to use the state to discriminate against whites. I believe whites should be able to discriminate against non whites.
All communists believe they should be able to use the state to impose their value system on everyone. I believe I should be able to use the state to help remove communism from the planet because there is no such thing as an economic system, only trade.
And so forth.
There is no such thing as a non-aggression principle in life. The world is made up of individuals containers of ideological stuff and that ideological stuff is always in competition with all other ideological stuff for dominance through extinguishment of all other containers of ideological stuff.
Or, to put it another way, non-agression principle only applies to genetically uniform civilizations. It can only work withing ethnically homogenous societies because values, philosophy and beliefs are down stream from genetics (that is to say, our values are encoded in our genes, although somewhat obtusely). Actually, even that is not true. The non-agression principle really only applies to white civilizations. I havent thought a lot about all of the other species of human, but, in black civilization non-agression principle is actually submission to be raped. In black culture, fronting + dominance behaviours are an ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT for survival, which is the exact opposite of the non-agression principle. Not only do blacks rely on agression as a survival strategy, their mating strategy is a strategy based around rape and raising of children communally.
The more you keep on pressing the issue the more you are making the point that the non-agression principle is a feature of the white species of human, because we are the only ones that expect it and practice it.
It's probably okay for us, but in a world with at least 7 different human species, it is basically equivalent to bending over.
The white species of humans also has another evolutionary trait that only works for members of our species but is an a negative on a global playing field and is getting our people killed and raped every single day: pathological altruism. Just like your need for the non-agression principle, pathological altruism only works within our species because it was an evolutinary mechanism select for in cold harsh climates for survival. Pathological altruism in a world with at leat 7 species of human is the equivalent of asking to be raped.
//EDIT: Added this paragraph in the wrong location:
Not only that, you want to know what is the worst part of pahtological altruism? Whites believe pathological altruism is a way to get non whites to respect you. You know how non-whites see pathological altruism? As weakness and a desire to be taken advantage of. Other species of humans see pahtological altruism as an invitation to be basically abused and even killed, because all other species of human only respect strength. Pathological altruism is only a white species thing, I know because that is PRECISELY my core measurement for dealing with other white people with respect to how much do I trust them. My highest altruistic expectations are with family, but white friends are not that much lower on the expecation scale.
Absolutely, I believe in our species not only surviving by creating a level of dominance on the planet such that no other human species will ever be able to challenge us.
To believe anything else is to decide that you should die, because that is what your enemies want for you.
(post is archived)