Justice would be killing the person at fault, not a child who isn't even aware of the situation.
Would it be justice if say, the mother who's child you killed, killed your other child in return and so on. When does it end? What kind of kiked logic are you trying to pull off here? Killing children is never an option, that's a jewish thought process. Even the italian mafia knew this, and they weren't exactly the best when it came to morals, but at least they respected the family and only went after the one that betrayed. You simply can't seem to understand that putting the blame on someone with nothing to do is, in every way possible, wrong, and I expect that if it came down to it, you wouldn't lay a finger on a child, because you are just merely talking shit.
If you believe it is so wrong, why are you challenging me to lay a finger on a child? Do you put any thoughts behind what you write?
That not what I said and you know damn well. If it were your child the one that got killed you wouldn't do what you suggested, that's what I meant. Ironic that you say that I don't put any thought behind what I write, especially coming from the guy that thinks going after children for revenge is justified. Give me a break, this is the best you could come up with?
I know exactly what I said and I stand for it. If you kill my child I will kill yours, expect it. I say that killing children is on the table. You say it's not while also goading me into proving my stance and doing it. You chose your words, and I chose mine.
(post is archived)