You demanded that I point out an instance where someone didn't obey FAA rules and didn't get shot down. I did that.
Lmao. Creating a false equivalency is not an answer. You provided an example that was not anywhere near comparable to what we were discussing. The dude wasn’t even in the air for 10 minutes. WE’RE TALKING ABOUT OPERATING NATIONAL FLIGHTS WITHOUT FAA CONSENT. False equivalency. Not a strawman. Jesus.
Now, it's "fly a commercial airliner from coast to coast and not respond to demands to land". That goal post move is the intellectual dishonesty
No, because THATS WHAT WE’VE BEEN DISCUSSING FROM THE BEGINNING; Whether or not national airlines could operate without following FAA regulations.
And again, they won't be shooting you down because you broke their rules. They will shoot you down if you pose an imminent threat to life.
Wrong. They will absolutely shoot you down if you don’t land when they tell you to. You KNOW this, and you’re deliberately lying just to keep a losing argument going. Annoying as fuck.
Show me you have the financial means to make good on your bet, and I'll take that bet. Of course, you'll have to define "commercial airliner" because you can't rent a plane from a commercial air carrier
Of course you can. A commercial airliner will absolutely rent a plane that is not being used at the moment. But regardless, any jumbo jet taken into the jet stream will do.
DM me to discuss how I can show you my financials without doxxing myself, and we’ll get it underway.
I don’t think I’ve ever won an internet argument by getting my opponent to commit suicide before, this’ll be interesting
We were discussing a person's ability to fly without a mask, the airline companies obligation to enforce a mask mandate, and whether you can break FAA rules without being shot down.
You've moved the goalposts to a completely different ballpark.
Delta, a commercial air carrier, cannot rent planes. And who said anything about the "jet stream"? The FAA regulates most airspace above 1700' agl over the US. And jumbo jets fly privately in that airspace, without permission, all the time.
We were discussing a person's ability to fly without a mask, the airline companies obligation to enforce a mask mandate, and whether you can break FAA rules without being shot down.
You've moved the goalposts to a completely different ballpark.
Totally fucking wrong. This entire thread started because you (or someone) said that an airline could operate with no mask policy and become wildly successful.
In order to do that, it’s naturally understood that the airline would have to operate nationally without the consent of the FAA.
There is no movement of the goal posts, it’s just that you’re now realizing that what your argument started with is completely fucking impossible.
An airline carrier could absolutely operate without a mask mandate just as easily as an employer can operate a business with more than 100 employees without the jab mandate.
The FAA mask mandate is every bit as worthless as the OSHA jab mandate. Issued without authority and can be ignored at will.
The airlines are in no more danger of being fined, prosecuted, or shot down as any major employer not mandating the jab.
(post is archived)