> Hope you're right. I do know people really are waking up. I am right. I talk to both the right and the left regularly. Both moderates and the non-moderates. The political and the apolitical. I have seen street thugs, who are pro blm, claim they are tired of race baiting bullshit and tired of being robbed by *politicians*. Not republicans. Not democrats. Politicians. I have seen asians, whites, blacks, mexicans, democrats, republicans, christians, muslims, and atheists all agree that they hate wallstreet and washington DC, and would universally like to see the parties *ripped* down. *Tar and feathers* sort of talk. Not even my own words. There is universal outrage, and general *condemnation* of DC and business-as-usual in washington and wallstreet. People are fed up. ANd I think the practice of infiltrating and dividing or destroying both protests and movements, has *not* thrown a wet blanket on a fire. But rather instead created a pressure cooker environment in politics, social organization, and economics. And its not pointed at *other* citizens. Its pointed squarely at the potomac. Secession talk, from the right *and now* from the left, isn't in fact small talk by the public. Its those "rumbles before the quake/ and tsunami" that I was warning about. If people aren't allowed to fix it together, then they wont go at each other. They'll unite against the regime that sought to make them fight each other. Fundamentally, again, they hate DC and wallstreet and the banks and media *more* than they hate each other. You can even see it in the rhetoric, the ones that aren't astroturfed: Even the radical leftwing opinion is one of *pity* at not being able to reach the right. The rights disgust over hypocrisy from the left? You only point out anothers hypocrisy when you want them to *change*. If you were going to *go to war* with someone, you wouldn't be bothered with pointing out their hypocrisy. The point of war is destroying an enemy, not changing them. Thats how you know the division is manufactured. Look at the real sentiments. The left and the right are nowhere near 'civil war'. Its also why the analysts in the fed. gov and NGOs, the ones being *ignored*, are calling "civil war *extremely* unlikely". Maybe they don't understand the real reasons *why* but in the back of their minds, they see the same thing: However radical the rhetoric, if you're planning on going to war with the other half of a country, the two sides *dont bother* with pity or pointing out the others hypocrisy. So when, not if, the fed. gov continues hammering on the public to fight each other, it can and will lead to them turning vehemtly against the regime. Imagine my shock.

We're aware now of democide