Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

213

(post is archived)

[–] • 8 pts

It's equally possible that person modified the video. There is nothing left to trust.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It is in the original broadcast from the trial. This has been posted about several times and it all gets discussed all over again each time due to this OP and others simply linking this random video of some guy talking about the actual court video instead of linking the actual court video as did in his post:

Here is the full video from NBC Chicago stream for that part of the trial. Skip to the marked time at 19:24.

Kyle Rittenhouse trial, dude's foot vanishes [19:24]

(edit: Take note that the entire lower half of the stream image shifts upward a few pixels right at that line where the foot disappears right when it disappears. Interestingly, I do not think it is enough of a shift up to erase the foot that much, and it also doesn't explain how the other foot does not also get removed if the line shift was all the way across the video.)

[–] • 2 pts

It wasn't in the other feed available at PBS, which shows both the guy on the right walk all the way up the isle, and the cop standing behind the douche after he 'disappeared' in the other vid. This is a waste of time.

[–] • 1 pt

tagging you also as I saw you mention wanting to see the full broadcast of this stream instead of some random guy talking about that clip from it.

[–] • 0 pt

lower half of the stream image shifts upward a few pixels right at that line where the foot disappears

not enough of a shift up to erase the foot that much

Agreed. I'm highly skeptical of a green-screen claim, but these two anomalies (which don't explain each other) are puzzling.

[–] • 4 pts (edited )

NoSo their really not puzzling.

When you use it the internet, your computers is getting the data in "packets" and assembling them to be an image.

If your internet is bad (which the judge jokingly said at least once how bad it is) the foot and pixels shifting is from packet loss from shitty connection.

So realistically

The computer was building information from packet 1-1 million

But somehow lost packets 22,000-25,000

The computer just compiles what packets you have and you get artifacting such as this dude's ghosted foot. And pixels shifting so you don't have a solid black bar going through the bottom of the image.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I agree, the video shown appears to show this effect, so I'd be interested in seeing this particular segment in the original PBS footage to confirm it wasn't manipulated. If it's the same in the original, I'd have to lean toward green screen. Without that, I'm very skeptical.

The only other rational explanation I can think of is video compression techniques, though to be honest I've never seen compression cause this kind of artifact in this kind of scene. Video compression likes to re-use slow and non-changing portions of surrounding frames to reduce filesize, which COULD potentially explain the missing foot, as well as the seemingly still audience.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah, people don't realize how sophisticated video compression is these days, and how high of a level it operates on the image, so you can get weird things. But this artifact doesn't make sense along those lines. Looking at the high-quality video on YouTube it doesn't seem that high compression was ever applied, so such a glaring effect wouldn't be present. Maybe there was some data loss in the stream and it patched it up, but that seems unlikely.

[–] • 2 pts

Fucking rat nigger kikes trying to destabalize your grasp on reality. Go fuck your rat mothers.

[–] • 2 pts

It's the world of confusion goy! You can only believe what we say to you!

[–] • 2 pts

(((this))) has been posted already and as obvious (((IAMThePie))) with the repost.

[–] • 0 pt

Man! You fcking (((hate))) reposts huuuuuh?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I posted this as well. I even posted the original video. Happens at 19:24-25. Same response you are getting here....they just can't accept it. There's also alot of videos showing Kyle doing freemason hand signals.

As for the guy using derogatory about lizard people. Have a look at this video of Albert Bourla's neck. From 10:16-10:18. It does this multiple times through out the interview. 7:20-25, 2-2:05 And yes the people in the comments are talking about it.

[–] • 1 pt

And then, there is this. I cannot say with 100% certainty this is him, but fck, it sure looks like him:

https://files.catbox.moe/shlh9q.jpg

[–] • 1 pt

IDGAF what anyone says, aliens are real, they are here, and they are the ones calling all the shots down here on prison planet earth. Exibit A 👆

[–] • 2 pts

That's not how greenscreens work.... Things aren't there one minute and gone the next. It doesn't disappear behind a screen, it disappears without moving. Seems like bullshit, and I am sure there are explanations that are far simpler than using a fucking greenscreen at a huge trial like this. It makes no sense.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I caught some crap here for suggesting that this was just another government fake operation. But in dribs and drabs, oddities keep surfacing. The best one so far was the arrest video of Gaige Grosskreutz six weeks after the alleged shooting of his bicep. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEcunOKw_lg At the time stamp 15:05 to 15:50, we see him being lifteds from the ground by his ruined arm without a peep, then handcuffed behind his back and placed in the cop car without any indication of pain or discomfort. Riiiight.

/let the flame war commence!

[–] • 1 pt

None of what you describe as suspicious are indications of muscle damage. Learn basic human physiology before you spout jewish nonsense.

Do you even know what function the bicep plays?

/let the flame war commence!

Yes. Because you're so fucking obvious. Just shut the fuck up. Stop thinking, you're bad at it, go dilate, then join the 40%.

[–] • 1 pt

I didn’t even have pain in my broken leg 6 weeks after the incident

[–] • 2 pts

This. The body works INSANELY hard to come to homeostasis or a degree of manageable return.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I had arm surgery 15 years ago. Couldn't drive for 6 months or use that arm for anything. And the pain lasted a mighty long time. You, good sir, are emotionally invested heavily in the Kyle saga, so anything anybody posts to the contrary gets a harsh reaction from you (and so far, from only you).

That video was not posted by me. Nor the more recent one about green screen. Nor ever shall I post a video about it, as obviously others find that things don't add up. But you do and say as you wish. Doesn't bother me in the least.

[–] • 2 pts

my case is precisely like all cases!!!!

I nearly lost a leg from an auto injury. Completely crushed and bent like a candy cane, foot up etc. Loss of blood. Loss of nerve function. Loss of muscle function. Complete destruction of bone function. '>$1 milllion in surgery costs and rehab. Pain gone in fewer than 2 months.

His was not tendon, which takes YEARS to fix. Mine was.

His was not nerve, which NEVER fixes. Mine was.

His was not bone, which takes months to years to fix. Mine was.

His was muscle and skin. Which takes weeks to fix.

[–] • 1 pt

I suggest that before you declare this as fake you find other supporting evidence. Yes it's odd, now go look for more, does the video loop or was that just a fucking assertion with no research behind it? It's there another similar issue in a different video?

[–] • 1 pt

The entire incident was as fake as the Dylan Storm Roof Charleston church “shooting” and subsequent show trial.

[–] • 0 pt

why does this "OMGerd, everfink wuz CGI, wake up sHeEpLe!!!" bullshit always have to infect the Right?

Just fuck off back to your flat earth forums.

also, birds aren't real

[–] • 0 pt

Fuck your sunk cost fallacy. You have probably spent all this time circlejerking about an event that was staged to begin with, and now when shown clear evidence of fakery, instead of refuting it or processing it your brain shorts out into defense mode.

People get really mad when they are presented with evidence that something they believe in is fake.

I’ve got news for you: news events are frequently faked. Shootings are frequently faked. Terror attacks are frequently faked.

Grow up and accept it.

[–] • 1 pt

shown clear evidence of fakery

you sound like the same fucktards who declare the existence of lizard people, because a video artefact made someone's eyes look funny...

you are a classic case of someone who has gone too far down the rabbit hole and now is too paranoid to connect with reality, because you now think everyone is lying.

You probably think your family are all crisis actors too...

get off the internet, go for a walk, eat better food, all this stuff you think matters, doesn't.

[–] • 1 pt

So you see something like a man’s foot penetrating through a solid tile floor on video and just shrug it off? It requires no explanation whatsoever? It doesn’t cause any doubt at all about the presentation of the event in question to you?

[–] • 0 pt

What if the access to courtroom was much more limited so they just added a fake audience? Maybe if someone talked to the defense?

[–] • 1 pt

But why would that be necessary? Just show it with the real, limited audience