Aha thank for that perspective.
Here is my take: I know a meth head when I see one. I know an alcoholic when I see one. I know a gambling addict when I see one. I know a loser with no deep thoughts or a future when I see one.
When I look at that see of white people in that clip, I see a bunch of drug addicts with no deep and meaningful thoughts of any kind. They were handed the world and spent it on idiealistic meaningless bullshit like all twenty year olds: sex, drugs and easy living.
I don't blame them. Like others posted every generation has it's cross to bear. But, THAT generation is a generation that when you see a clip above, is when you immediately know everything about them. Young. Smug. Lazy. Drug addicts. Convinced of their infallability. Convinced of their "we are all one" and "all we need is love". OF COURSE THEY GAVE THE COUNTRY AWAY?
What does a gambling addict do? Sells his kids future to the casino. What does an alcoholic do? Drink away his kids future through the liquor store.
Of course these fuckers gave away the world they were gifted.
When we watch and listen to the culture of that era, what we are seeing is the swansong of the UTTER FUCKING IDIOT. The 60s was NOT a swinging fun time, the cultural revolution did not happen at Height and Ashbury. The culture got consumed and sold off alike a cheap hooker by a generation that never valued it self, never valued their parents, never valued their culture, never valued their future and pissed it all away.
Like all drug addicts.
That video is what drug addiction does.
When I look at that see of white people in that clip, I see a bunch of drug addicts with no deep and meaningful thoughts of any kind.
When I look at that video, I see a rock concert, where young people went to get high and sway unsteadily to music. Had the video been shot at a strip club or burlesque, would you assume that that generation was all horny perverts? If I showed you a video clip of soldiers returning from Vietnam, would you assume that that entire generation was shell-shocked and war-weary?
I think maybe you're too easily influenced by images and memes and sound bites and video clips. I think that maybe your shallow apprehension of the world is part of the problem. We have millions of discrete moments in our lives, and they cannot be defined by a single video clip at a single venue, you incredible dumbass.
That is entirely plausible. That is also a very jew way of looking at the world if that is the only way that you look at the world.
What jews do is exactly what you just did. Decompose an idea, a sentence or a narrative into abstract individual symbols and start examining the individual symbols out of context and marvel at their complexity. In your words, we are made up of millions of discrete moments in our lives and you cannot be defined by any one.
This is a useful technique for examining a problem, but only one of many. When trying to fully understand the dimension of a problem, you need to be able to zoom in and out of the problem at different resolutions because you need to examine the distinction between the atom, the molecule, the system and the universe and how all of those resolutions allow you to the behaviour of the system.
All you have managed to say is that you like your zoom factor and you prefer to analyze the human experience at a single level of resolution.
To get a more rounded understanding of the human experience, you need to be able to zoom in to the resolution that you are talking about and then even beyond. And then also zoom out and beyond.
So, for example, you can say something like you just said that at your level of resolution we are individual events that don't define us and be absolutely correct. You can also zoom out and say that is absolutely wrong because those millions of individual individual events all connect into a narrative that if you play it backwards and forward provide past explanatory power and future predictive power at any point in that narrative through line simply by knowing a little bit about the individual bits before the point in time you are examining and some variables in the environment. You can zoom out even further to the species level and say something like this conversation is not only wrong but irrelevant because the sun is about to blow in 2 billion years, swallow the planet in 1 billion years, boil off our oceans in 500 million years which realistically only gives us 100 million years or less to get off this planet and successfully seed planets within our galaxy. You can zoom out even further and say all of that is pointless and we are too late to start even planning for survival because the andromeda galaxy will merge with our milky way in a few billion years beyond that and throw our galaxy into chaos and like throw us out of the galaxy it self, and we should have been looking to develop intra-galaxy travel about 2 billion years ago if you wanted to project manage this.
You can also zoom in and say something like, all of the above is meaningless because we aren't even alive. We are merely genetic machines following a program, see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_tYrnv_o6A
What I am getting at is that you are simultaneously right and wrong because you are not taking into account the limitations of human language and cognition. We don't have the ability to simultaneously speak about things that are true at one level of resolution and wrong or different at others, even though we exist at all resolutions of existence simultaneously.
Or, to put it another way, it is absolutely correct to stereotype humans and give them individuality. So we can say something like: all niggers are rapists and are extremely dangers. individual niggers are individual humans working their way through the world to survive as best they can and we should treat them like individuals. Both of those statements are true even though they are contradictory.
Or to put it another way, we can indeed say what you said about those individuals in the clip and you would be correct. It would also be correct to say that all of those individuals are not only participating in a grand narrative of their own life, it is also correct to say (if we zoom out just a bit) that they are participating as free human individuals capable of making their own unique choices within the context of their own unique life narrative , a cult that has done such unbelievable damage to our culture that the only fair way to describe what we see in that clip is a bunch of people that are basically shallow minded low iq drug addicts that believe they can make the world a better place because they know better than their parents.
The run on sentence is deliberate.
Those fucking people, just like the white kids today convinced to join commies, believed they know how to make the world a better place. Just like a gambler destroys their childrens future, these fucking degenerates knew so little about the world around them and had such shallow interest in understanding the world around them that they effectively doomed their children, grand children and beyond into slavery by onboarding value systems so dangerous and damaging that we absolutely have to place blame on their shoulders.
Like our kids will place blame on our shoulders if we don't do the work necessary to at minimum prove that we understand the world and we started the work necessary to return our lands to the hands of our decendants.
And eventually make sure that our white genetics make it out of this doomed galaxy and spreads throughout the entirety of the livable universe.
All you have managed to say is that you like your zoom factor and you prefer to analyze the human experience at a single level of resolution.
Actually I was pointing out that when you point a camera you are framing something, and that the rest of the universe lays just outside that camera's frame.
See how you can get a point across without the wall of text?
(post is archived)