When I look at that see of white people in that clip, I see a bunch of drug addicts with no deep and meaningful thoughts of any kind.
When I look at that video, I see a rock concert, where young people went to get high and sway unsteadily to music. Had the video been shot at a strip club or burlesque, would you assume that that generation was all horny perverts? If I showed you a video clip of soldiers returning from Vietnam, would you assume that that entire generation was shell-shocked and war-weary?
I think maybe you're too easily influenced by images and memes and sound bites and video clips. I think that maybe your shallow apprehension of the world is part of the problem. We have millions of discrete moments in our lives, and they cannot be defined by a single video clip at a single venue, you incredible dumbass.
That is entirely plausible. That is also a very jew way of looking at the world if that is the only way that you look at the world.
What jews do is exactly what you just did. Decompose an idea, a sentence or a narrative into abstract individual symbols and start examining the individual symbols out of context and marvel at their complexity. In your words, we are made up of millions of discrete moments in our lives and you cannot be defined by any one.
This is a useful technique for examining a problem, but only one of many. When trying to fully understand the dimension of a problem, you need to be able to zoom in and out of the problem at different resolutions because you need to examine the distinction between the atom, the molecule, the system and the universe and how all of those resolutions allow you to the behaviour of the system.
All you have managed to say is that you like your zoom factor and you prefer to analyze the human experience at a single level of resolution.
To get a more rounded understanding of the human experience, you need to be able to zoom in to the resolution that you are talking about and then even beyond. And then also zoom out and beyond.
So, for example, you can say something like you just said that at your level of resolution we are individual events that don't define us and be absolutely correct. You can also zoom out and say that is absolutely wrong because those millions of individual individual events all connect into a narrative that if you play it backwards and forward provide past explanatory power and future predictive power at any point in that narrative through line simply by knowing a little bit about the individual bits before the point in time you are examining and some variables in the environment. You can zoom out even further to the species level and say something like this conversation is not only wrong but irrelevant because the sun is about to blow in 2 billion years, swallow the planet in 1 billion years, boil off our oceans in 500 million years which realistically only gives us 100 million years or less to get off this planet and successfully seed planets within our galaxy. You can zoom out even further and say all of that is pointless and we are too late to start even planning for survival because the andromeda galaxy will merge with our milky way in a few billion years beyond that and throw our galaxy into chaos and like throw us out of the galaxy it self, and we should have been looking to develop intra-galaxy travel about 2 billion years ago if you wanted to project manage this.
You can also zoom in and say something like, all of the above is meaningless because we aren't even alive. We are merely genetic machines following a program, see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_tYrnv_o6A
What I am getting at is that you are simultaneously right and wrong because you are not taking into account the limitations of human language and cognition. We don't have the ability to simultaneously speak about things that are true at one level of resolution and wrong or different at others, even though we exist at all resolutions of existence simultaneously.
Or, to put it another way, it is absolutely correct to stereotype humans and give them individuality. So we can say something like: all niggers are rapists and are extremely dangers. individual niggers are individual humans working their way through the world to survive as best they can and we should treat them like individuals. Both of those statements are true even though they are contradictory.
Or to put it another way, we can indeed say what you said about those individuals in the clip and you would be correct. It would also be correct to say that all of those individuals are not only participating in a grand narrative of their own life, it is also correct to say (if we zoom out just a bit) that they are participating as free human individuals capable of making their own unique choices within the context of their own unique life narrative , a cult that has done such unbelievable damage to our culture that the only fair way to describe what we see in that clip is a bunch of people that are basically shallow minded low iq drug addicts that believe they can make the world a better place because they know better than their parents.
The run on sentence is deliberate.
Those fucking people, just like the white kids today convinced to join commies, believed they know how to make the world a better place. Just like a gambler destroys their childrens future, these fucking degenerates knew so little about the world around them and had such shallow interest in understanding the world around them that they effectively doomed their children, grand children and beyond into slavery by onboarding value systems so dangerous and damaging that we absolutely have to place blame on their shoulders.
Like our kids will place blame on our shoulders if we don't do the work necessary to at minimum prove that we understand the world and we started the work necessary to return our lands to the hands of our decendants.
And eventually make sure that our white genetics make it out of this doomed galaxy and spreads throughout the entirety of the livable universe.
All you have managed to say is that you like your zoom factor and you prefer to analyze the human experience at a single level of resolution.
Actually I was pointing out that when you point a camera you are framing something, and that the rest of the universe lays just outside that camera's frame.
See how you can get a point across without the wall of text?
The wall of text was a sandbox for saying you are too stupid to work your way out of this one.
Nice try post a deepity though.
// EDIT: We all got what you mean about context.
The important part of my original derisive commentary on the people in the video is specifically not to give the easy way out which would be, hey man context, it's just a concert and people having fun.
It was to glibly critique an entire generation the way our decendants will critique us based on analysis that is true if we are trying to figure out why we are here. The whole, hey context man, is fine and true. For the purposes of a conversation that wants to have some past explanatory power and future predictive power, hey it's context man is a narrative tool specifically used to get out of that conversation that I'm not terribly interested in having.
That entire generation of people inherited a beautiful world and literally fucking gave it away to jews, niggers, shitskins and chinks.
(post is archived)