WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

**DAY 12 **

Poal Live Chat: https://poal.co/chat

Highlights = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465396 Day 01 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/460710 Day 02 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/461177 Day 03 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462118 Day 04 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462654 Day 05 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462657 Day 06 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/463952 Day 07 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/464459 Day 08 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/464891 Day 09 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465399 Day 10 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465942 Final = Jury 1 = Jury 2 =


Alternative streams:


Reddit megathread for potential salt:

https://old.reddit.com/r/wisconsin/comments/quiml8/rittenhouse_trial_megathread_1115/


Anticlutch comments, no actual legal bearing;

REMEMBER;

The motion for mistrial with prejudice has never been brought.

There is going to be little comment from me during the stream. There isn't much happening and you can tailor your own thoughts on the closing statements of each side.

Even the "based" judge used the word "murder" twice when the charges ARE NOT MURDER, but are homicide. It's ridiculous.

Defense got self defense allowed to be instructed for all HOMICIDE charges. Which is good. But denying it for McGinnis who was a bystander behind jew Rosenbaum. However they got the judge to add a line that if his conduct with respect to Rosenbaum was legal (self defense) then he is NOT breaking the law with respect to McGinnis. So it's good.

Gun count dismissed - minor in possession.

Sounded like a good ruling on a final instruction but it was confusing on which. It had to do with the gun though.

ALL motions over. Jury instruction now.

Judge specifically points out how the weapons possession charge is gone. Seems good to me. It brings into question all other charges.

Going over (((lesser included))) charges. This is what was gone over yesterday. It's a jewish creation to cause convictions by a "hung jury" who are otherwise on "not guilty" for the superseding charge but hangouts are stuck up and bargain up to the (((lesser included))).

Binger is quibbling over jury instructions. He know he has no case and is pandering to emotion through how the rules will be introduced.

Judge just neutered (((lesser included))) by stating if they find not guilty for the primary offense due to Self Defense then they're done for the (((lesser included))) as well.

Adding (((dangerous weapon))) enhancement.

jew DA Binger's argument;

murder murder murder murder murder murder murder

I hate reality. jew DA Binger continually lying not only about the law and what happened but evidence, is speculating, and is entirely emotional based.

jewdge just allowed jew Binger to claim there's no dispute about something that there is in-fact dispute over.

BACK

Rosenbaum had a gun. This is proven.

He could have fired warning shots to demonstrate that he isn't a threat.

Firing a gun within city limits without cause is illegal. Warning shots are illegal.

DEFENSE WITH THE LOLS!!!

... I can't answer that, but I guess Mr. Rosembaum can't either. Mr. Binger says that's impossible (going for Kyle's gun), that's garbage, just like his (Binger's) case.

Rofl

When your defense closing arguments is so good that Binger's eye starts twitching.

kek literally called Binger stupid

It was a small fire!!!

last I checked small fires turn into big fires.

Fatty is up for reply and he just threw away EVERYTHING. He keeps bringing up how Rosenbaum totally couldn't kill someone with his bare hands. ... A 3 year old could kill someone with their hands.

The judge is having to correct over fatty for a second time in a row. Sending the jury into the library and removing a piece of argument from the total.

fatty

Guns don't have a side. They don't have a left and right sided.

Which is 100% false.


Jury's up. But tomorrow.

# **DAY 12 [HERE](https://poal.co/s/Videos/467577)** ## Poal Live Chat: https://poal.co/chat Highlights = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465396 Day 01 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/460710 Day 02 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/461177 Day 03 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462118 Day 04 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462654 Day 05 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462657 Day 06 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/463952 Day 07 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/464459 Day 08 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/464891 Day 09 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465399 Day 10 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465942 Final = Jury 1 = Jury 2 = ---- ### Alternative streams: - LiveNOW from FOX: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvhxYyKMew4 - CBSNews: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXWDSlFdxOg - ABCNews: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_Ma8oQLmSM - PBSNews: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSJb9y6BIao - Law & crime, chat enabled:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIu-N-FDTo ---- #### Reddit megathread for potential salt: https://old.reddit.com/r/wisconsin/comments/quiml8/rittenhouse_trial_megathread_1115/ ---- #### Anticlutch comments, no actual legal bearing; #**REMEMBER;** The motion for mistrial with prejudice has never been brought. There is going to be little comment from me during the stream. There isn't much happening and you can tailor your own thoughts on the closing statements of each side. Even the "based" judge used the word "murder" twice when the charges ARE NOT MURDER, but are homicide. It's ridiculous. Defense got self defense allowed to be instructed for all **HOMICIDE** charges. Which is good. But denying it for McGinnis who was a bystander behind jew Rosenbaum. However they got the judge to add a line that if his conduct with respect to Rosenbaum was legal (self defense) then he is NOT breaking the law with respect to McGinnis. So it's good. Gun count dismissed - minor in possession. Sounded like a good ruling on a final instruction but it was confusing on which. It had to do with the gun though. #**ALL motions over. Jury instruction now.** Judge specifically points out how the weapons possession charge is gone. Seems good to me. It brings into question all other charges. Going over (((lesser included))) charges. This is what was gone over yesterday. It's a jewish creation to cause convictions by a "hung jury" who are otherwise on "not guilty" for the superseding charge but hangouts are stuck up and bargain up to the (((lesser included))). Binger is quibbling over jury instructions. He know he has no case and is pandering to emotion through how the rules will be introduced. Judge just neutered (((lesser included))) by stating if they find not guilty for the primary offense due to Self Defense then they're done for the (((lesser included))) as well. Adding (((dangerous weapon))) enhancement. jew DA Binger's argument; >murder >murder >murder >murder >murder >murder >murder I hate reality. jew DA Binger continually lying not only about the law and what happened but evidence, is speculating, and is entirely emotional based. jewdge just allowed jew Binger to claim there's no dispute about something that there is in-fact dispute over. #BACK ~~Rosenbaum had a gun. This is proven.~~ >He could have fired warning shots to demonstrate that he isn't a threat. Firing a gun within city limits without cause is illegal. Warning shots are illegal. #DEFENSE WITH THE LOLS!!! >... I can't answer that, but I guess Mr. Rosembaum can't either. >Mr. Binger says that's impossible (going for Kyle's gun), that's garbage, just like his (Binger's) case. Rofl >When your defense closing arguments is so good that Binger's eye starts twitching. kek literally called Binger stupid >It was a small fire!!! >>last I checked small fires turn into big fires. Fatty is up for reply and he just threw away EVERYTHING. He keeps bringing up how Rosenbaum totally couldn't kill someone with his bare hands. ... A 3 year old could kill someone with their hands. The judge is having to correct over fatty for a second time in a row. Sending the jury into the library and removing a piece of argument from the total. >fatty >>Guns don't have a side. They don't have a left and right sided. Which is 100% false. ---- Jury's up. But tomorrow.

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Warning shots? Those are illegal everywhere I'm aware of. They typically fall under a "brandishing" charge, since if you're in sufficient danger to use a gun you're in sufficient danger to shoot your assailant. If you aren't in sufficient danger, you shouldnt draw your weapon much less discharge it.

The only counter-example I can think of was a bar owner in Nebraska who fired warning shots while being choked by a rioter he later shot to death. Even then I suspect the only reason that was ignored was because "warning shots" vs "missed shots" are a matter of semantics any defense attorney can easily win.

[–] 2 pts

Not according to

[–] 1 pt

Dementia Gramps likely cant remember which end of the gun goes bang.

[–] 0 pt

All he knows is the gun goes bang with minors.