• (edited )

Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 10 megathread - 9:00 AM Central Time - closing all the loose ends - will the motion for mistrial with prejudice be mentioned? (www.youtube.com)

THE LAW & CRIME STREAM IS THE BETTER STREAM.

Poal Live Chat: https://poal.co/chat

Highlights = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465396 Day 01 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/460710 Day 02 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/461177 Day 03 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462118 Day 04 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462654 Day 05 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462657 Day 06 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/463952 Day 07 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/464459 Day 08 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/464891 Day 09 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465399 Day 10 =

Alternative streams:

Rekieta law, chat enabled, lawyer banter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kugIqK6yhoM
Law & crime, chat enabled: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9shc9CU75zc
PBS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN9vwdEq0t0

Reddit megathread for potential salt:

Day # Motions;

https://poal.co/s/Videos/465942/e5767aa2-10a1-410a-a91e-9952b6876540#cmnts

multitude of lesser included offenses and charges added to the state charges.
go down to comment about this for details. I'm not copy and reformatting for up here.

Anticlutch comments, no actual legal bearing;

I am going to use a lot of reddit double spacing below rather than denoting each separate edit. If the motion for mistrial with prejudice isn't AT LEAST heard and given a significant period of time this will confirm to me that everything outside of Kyle glows. RekietaLaw stream: "murder charge" "murder charge" "murder charge" "murder charge" "murder charge"

HE IS NOT CHARGED WITH MURDER

It's becoming more and more apparent who RekietaLaw is.

A Motion to call for Directed Verdict needs to be called by the Defense. Judges CAN do it themselves but it's rare.

Recall: the ONLY person who testified that the child-molesting, glow asset Rosenbaum was not reaching for Kyle's gun is the DA himself. Whose testimony is not "testimony".

RECALL;

Ziminski...

who fired the first shot.
who ordered child rapist jew Rosembaum to go after and kill Kyle.

...was ordered to stay in the state and is subpoenaed. Has not been questioned. Whose testimony was never gotten. Etc.

Judge;

The DA has requested a multitude of lesser included offenses.

My comments below; So far at noon CST today the judge is coming off as a controlled actor and fully anti-Kyle.

Kyle is fucked.

All streams still up. Not done? Just lunch?

#**THE LAW & CRIME STREAM IS THE BETTER STREAM.** ## Poal Live Chat: https://poal.co/chat Highlights = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465396 Day 01 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/460710 Day 02 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/461177 Day 03 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462118 Day 04 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462654 Day 05 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/462657 Day 06 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/463952 Day 07 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/464459 Day 08 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/464891 Day 09 = https://poal.co/s/Videos/465399 Day 10 = ---- ### Alternative streams: - Rekieta law, chat enabled, lawyer banter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kugIqK6yhoM - Law & crime, chat enabled: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9shc9CU75zc - PBS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN9vwdEq0t0 ---- #### Reddit megathread for potential salt: ---- #### Day # Motions; https://poal.co/s/Videos/465942/e5767aa2-10a1-410a-a91e-9952b6876540#cmnts - multitude of lesser included offenses and charges added to the state charges. - go down to comment about this for details. I'm not copy and reformatting for up here. #### Anticlutch comments, no actual legal bearing; **I am going to use a lot of reddit double spacing below rather than denoting each separate edit.** If the motion for mistrial with prejudice isn't AT LEAST heard and given a significant period of time this will confirm to me that everything outside of Kyle glows. RekietaLaw stream: "murder charge" "murder charge" "murder charge" "murder charge" "murder charge" #**HE IS NOT CHARGED WITH MURDER** It's becoming more and more apparent who RekietaLaw is. A Motion to call for Directed Verdict needs to be called by the Defense. Judges CAN do it themselves but it's rare. Recall: the ONLY person who testified that the child-molesting, glow asset Rosenbaum was not reaching for Kyle's gun is the DA himself. Whose testimony is not "testimony". #**RECALL**; Ziminski... - who fired the first shot. - who ordered child rapist jew Rosembaum to go after and kill Kyle. ...was ordered to stay in the state and is subpoenaed. Has not been questioned. Whose testimony was never gotten. Etc. Judge; >The DA has requested a multitude of lesser included offenses. My comments below; So far at noon CST today the judge is coming off as a controlled actor and fully anti-Kyle. Kyle is fucked. All streams still up. Not done? Just lunch?

[–] [Sticky] • 5 pts

(edited )

ACC: means it's an AntiClutch Comment and is not quoting a law or an individual but rather a self-clarification or thought about the topic.

Day #10 Motion #1

Lesser included charge of upgrading from second-degree to first-degree reckless homicide
- Defense objects.
Judge goes over rules of the difference of the two.
It's very confusing how they're going over this. I suggest watching it.
ACC: I think what the issue is "1st reckless " versus "2nd intentional"
Judge rules on not submitting this motion.

Day #10 Motion #2

Same as above? With regard to Mr McGinnis who was behind Rosembaum and thus "in danger".
judge will sit on and think of this one with a bias of giving the instruction. (Siding with motion

Maybe just lunch? All streams still on.

>ACC: means it's an AntiClutch Comment and is not quoting a law or an individual but rather a self-clarification or thought about the topic. ### Day #10 Motion #1 - Lesser included charge of upgrading from second-degree to first-degree reckless homicide - Defense objects. - Judge goes over rules of the difference of the two. - It's very confusing how they're going over this. I suggest watching it. - ACC: I think what the issue is "1st reckless " versus "2nd intentional" - Judge rules on not submitting this motion. ### Day #10 Motion #2 - Same as above? With regard to Mr McGinnis who was behind Rosembaum and thus "in danger". - judge will sit on and think of this one with a bias of giving the instruction. (Siding with motion [DA]) ### Day #10 Motion #3 - Same issue. Giving a specific jury instruction which is not for the charge but makes it harder on Kyle. - Judge denies this motion. ### Day #10 Motion #4 - Defense did not object to two parts of this motion. - Judge denied the third part of this motion. ### Day #10 Motion #5 - Just adding jury instructions and increasing charges??? - Judge holds off on ruling leaning toward agreeing with the state, his employer. ### Day #10 Motion #6 - This is about the minor in pos. of a dangerous weapon charge. - Most arguments are about this specific charge. - Burden is on the state and they've never presented evidence of this. They're quibbling about this fact now. - Unclear on specifics. Judge said he would include some set of rules but very trimmed down I think. ### Day #10 Motion #7 - On provocation of the attacks. - This is about the heavily argued about and modified picture. - ACC: Judge starts a break, this is a heavy issue with lots of back and forth. - Judge just dismantles Binger's argument over the picture yesterday about cell phone pinching and zooming. - Judge's ringtone went off again, (((media))) are going to have a field day with this again. - Defense just calls out the suspicious individual Ziminski not being called. - Judge's ringtone went off again, (((media))) are going to have a field day with this again. - They showed a 1920 x 844 image on a 4k TV again and the Defense brings up how that's just adding pixels too. - This is going bad for the State but... - ACC: what this means is that if provacation is found to be Kyle's fault then the jury may see the instruction they may buy into the lies of; - Kyle shouldn't have been there. - He shouldn't have had a gun. - He crossed state lines. - etc. - This is a clusterfuck. The state is committing perjury over and over and over again. Basing all their evidence off of hearsay. - ACC: holee fuck. The judge is allowing the State's evidence. - this is absolutely fucked. This is **HORRIBLE** for Kyle Judge going over what a (((lesser included offense))) is. It's jewish as fuck. No motions by the (((defense))). Hearing is over. At the end of the stream Kyle is walking with a police officer to the quarters behind the stand, which is the judge's office. You can't just go back there. Ever. [1](https://pic8.co/sh/eFcVdH.png) [2](https://pic8.co/sh/gfcQbL.png) [3](https://pic8.co/sh/jTev64.png) Maybe just lunch? All streams still on.

link

[–] • 11 pts

The DA is performing a very specific tactic here.

Hes making all these similar motions, fully knowing they'll be denied. And hes doing it, not because he knows he'll get one past, but hoping it does one thing:

Hes hoping repeated exposure to the same message over and over will sway the jury or bias them simply from hearing the same message on repeat.

It's the "Big lie" tactic the occupation's useful idiots on the left are fond of resorting to and projecting onto the rest of us.

parent
link

[–] • 4 pts

Jury is not present.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

I may be mistaken, but I don't think the jury is in there right now.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

I may be mistaken, but I don't think the jury is in there right now.

Not watching, just reading. Unfortunately too busy most days.

If its not for the jury, then its for the public who are watching closely. Convict him in the court of public opinion, and thats pretext enough for the cog's leftwing shitmilitia to threaten jurors, judges, and anyone else that might have sway in the case.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 5 pts

I knew this was going to happen. The DA is going to try to get jury instructions that include a host of bullshit lesser charges, then will tell the jury in closing that he had to do SOMETHING wrong since bad things happened, in order to be able to claim a victory.

parent
link

[–] • 4 pts

It's slimey as heck. They're adding a bunch of lesser charges because they know they've lost the greater charges. The odd thing from my laymen knowledge is that the defense now has to argue in favor of the greater charges. It's weird.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

he's a kike

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

How the fuck can you add new charges once the trial is already happening? That makes no sense.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • -7 pt

Why doesn’t he just collect his tears so he can keep jerking off the judge? Asking for a layman

parent
link

Load more (3 replies)

[–] • 1 pt

Anticlutch coming in clutch with this thread.

This is a clusterfuck. The state is committing perjury over and over and over again. Basing all their evidence off of hearsay.
ACC: holee fuck. The judge is allowing the State's evidence. this is absolutely fucked. This is HORRIBLE for Kyle

Is this where the trial stands now?

parent
link

[–] • 6 pts

The case never had a chance and is being actively thrown to make sure riots happen.

link

[–] • 3 pts

If they convict him then right wingers and Whites better fucking riot.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

I missed yesterday. What happened? It seemed like the prosecution has done a garbage job, Gaige Grosskike had a damning testimony, and they were admonished multiple times by the judge.

As I’m typing this, I realized what you’re saying. The prosecution is throwing it on purpose to get more riots this time featuring a false flag or two.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

Yeah, seems like they want a guarantee of an innocent finding.

Or, maybe they are going for a mistrial to buy more time?

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

looks like they know he's innocent but are trying to railroad on lesser charges

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

I doesn’t seem like the judge would fall for that, but it’s the (((legal system))) so who knows.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 1 pt

good

that also means it's established that patriots can defend their communities

parent
link

[–] • 5 pts

(edited )

that also means it's established that patriots can defend their communities

can or allowed to?

You always can, are able.

Thats not the question.

It's whether you believe permission is needed at all to defend against obvious, out of control mobs of blatant rioters commiting rampant arson, murder, theft, and other crimes.

You should, at this stage, believe that permission is not only NOT necessary, but the act of the state requiring permission is itself an act of violence and lawlessness by the state. You should be at the point where you believe that the state even suggesting such things is not merely questionable but a grievous offense against the public peace for even the suggestion.

Process as punishment is a grievous crime against the peace. Even bureaucrats suggesting requiring permission in the face of videos of violent mobs, is unacceptable.

The mere implication that self and community defense may be a crime, in the face of video evidence, should be sufficient grounds for termination from office with prejudice, without pay, disbarment for lawyers, and loss of professional license for "experts".

We need our own DAs.

The same way we need our own school boards.

And sheriffs.

And judges.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

The same way we need our own school boards.

And sheriffs.

And judges.

I'll be all three.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, except you'll go to trial not for defending your community, but a whole bunch of lesser charges and accusations where your compliance to 10,000 pages of law will be under intense scrutiny and you'll finally get 30 years for some bullshit theory the jury who knows jack shit about firearms is convinced to believe.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

We both know that the only thing that matters to juries in CURRENT YEAR is jury intimidation. They just have to be scared of the good guys.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 1 pt

Eh idk. After today and yesterday it’s starting to not look good. Doubt he’s going to get found guilty on the big charges, but very likely he’ll be found guilty on a charge that will at least hold jail time

parent
link

[–] • 5 pts

So far at noon CST today the judge is coming off as a controlled actor and fully anti-Kyle.

Judges usually sound like this at the end for whatever reason no matter what horse shit the case is

t. been where kyles sitting before and experienced it.

link

[–] • 2 pts

can you edit title to 10 rather than 9?

link

[–] • 2 pts

How the fuck is this spam you fucking kike? Please explain. https://pic8.co/sh/vNteZA.png

link

[–] • 2 pts

(edited )

Let us imagine for just a second, a hypothetical situation: Mr. Kyle Rittenhouse, instead of being born so "m̶a̶l̶e̶,̶ ̶p̶a̶l̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶l̶e̶", he had the great privilege to have been born born, oh, let's say, 🅑🅛🅐🅒🅚, as Kyle Malcom X Jones Jr. III... Not changing anything else about the events that happened that night, save for this one ᵗᵉᵉⁿˢʸ ʷᵉᵉⁿˢʸ little thing: that Kyle was simply born 🅑🅛🅐🅒🅚. Do any of you think that this event would have ever become national news if Kyle had been 🅑🅛🅐🅒🅚? Do any of you think that this event would have ever even made the nightly news in Kenosha, Wisconsin if Kyle had been 🅑🅛🅐🅒🅚? Or do you think what I think, that this event still would have made national headlines, except this time the national MSM would be declaring Kyle Malcom X Jones Jr. III the poor victim of the lynching attempts of a group of white supremacists, and criminal conviction would've befallen all evil whites involved in the attempted murder of Kyle Malcom X Jones Jr. III, who is an outstanding citizen, stepping into harms way to protect the poor peaceful protesters from a group of white supremacists that showed up to terrorize the BLM protesters that night? We all know this is how it would've played out if things had been, ahem, 🅓🅘🅕🅕🅔🅡🅔🅝🅣.

link

[–] • 1 pt

No because if Kyle had been a nigger he'd be have been rioting. 99.9% of niggers are leftists.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

Just watching this shit show makes me feel as though it's much better to be carried by six rather than judged by 12! I would much rather die than go to prison (the prison time Kyle is facing is not Club FED) and be some nigger bitch! No one recovers from being raped in prison...and this poor kid would be probably be raped and killed inside a year anyway! Needless to say, I have a CCW Permit for CA and I never carry unless I'm with a family member...reason being that I will risk going to prison to save my son, daughter or nieces, but I will not risk it for just myself. In CA, if you shoot and kill someone...no matter how right you are in doing it, your going to do serious jail time.