Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

We talk a lot of shit around here and dump on people like Jew Peterson because he pretended to be what he is not. I have my doubts about those critiques being true, but none the less, he did explicitly come out as being anti-white which is taking the position that white people need to die.

However, there is A LOT that we can learn from him. When Peterson first came out with his narratives, he pulled all of humanity forward in understanding and armed everyone with weapons of narrative and context. Some of us expect him to take that into one direction or another, but, he chose to take a stand against us.

Fair enough, there are rasons beyond ((( ))).

However, a student of boxing doesn't study the greats to worship them. A student of boxing studies the greats to learn technique, learn context, learn strengths and weaknesses and how to think about understanding their own skills as they enter the ring.

Here is a great example of a master of language, narrative, context and relative subject matter peeling the skin off of a basically a leftist retard. Well, maybe harsh. The leftist cannot be granted anything more than the label of retard, but, really he is what Dr. Ed Dutton calls a MIDWIT.

The clip is really instructive in technique and approach. On the one hand, Peterson has the following options:

  • lose
  • draw
  • win

Obviously he doesn't want to lose. However, winning an argument with a midwit like the interviewer is easy, if you are quick enough you can easily make him look like a fool by making everything he says into a joke. This is easy because everything the midwit says sounds deep but isn't.

Instead, Peterson leaves winning off the table and instead choose to, EVERY TIME, to take the argument and create a situation where the conversation is a draw. He gets to demonstrate to the audience that he is intellectually dancing around someone who is basically retarded, but he does it without putting them down and onboarding the stench of bad faith. Instead, he lets the midwit and his audience hold the shovels full of shit and demonstrate to the world their true nature (usually via post interview responses). In a way, Peterson wins the argument by deliberately going for a draw and winning on higher levels of execution an polish.

Vid is also an excellent example of Peterson trying to explain to a midwit that the problem with midwits trying to fix the world is that they are midwits and they don't have the skills to actually fix anything. The leftist retard is UTTERLY unaware that Peterson is talking about HIM during the entire interview.

Learn from your enemies, they have skills that we need.

We talk a lot of shit around here and dump on people like Jew Peterson because he pretended to be what he is not. I have my doubts about those critiques being true, but none the less, he did explicitly come out as being anti-white which is taking the position that white people need to die. However, there is A LOT that we can learn from him. When Peterson first came out with his narratives, he pulled all of humanity forward in understanding and armed everyone with weapons of narrative and context. Some of us expect him to take that into one direction or another, but, he chose to take a stand against us. Fair enough, there are rasons beyond ((( ))). However, a student of boxing doesn't study the greats to worship them. A student of boxing studies the greats to learn technique, learn context, learn strengths and weaknesses and how to think about understanding their own skills as they enter the ring. Here is a great example of a master of language, narrative, context and relative subject matter peeling the skin off of a basically a leftist retard. Well, maybe harsh. The leftist cannot be granted anything more than the label of retard, but, really he is what Dr. Ed Dutton calls a MIDWIT. The clip is really instructive in technique and approach. On the one hand, Peterson has the following options: * lose * draw * win Obviously he doesn't want to lose. However, winning an argument with a midwit like the interviewer is easy, if you are quick enough you can easily make him look like a fool by making everything he says into a joke. This is easy because everything the midwit says sounds deep but isn't. Instead, Peterson leaves winning off the table and instead choose to, EVERY TIME, to take the argument and create a situation where the conversation is a draw. He gets to demonstrate to the audience that he is intellectually dancing around someone who is basically retarded, but he does it without putting them down and onboarding the stench of bad faith. Instead, he lets the midwit and his audience hold the shovels full of shit and demonstrate to the world their true nature (usually via post interview responses). In a way, Peterson wins the argument by deliberately going for a draw and winning on higher levels of execution an polish. Vid is also an excellent example of Peterson trying to explain to a midwit that the problem with midwits trying to fix the world is that they are midwits and they don't have the skills to actually fix anything. The leftist retard is UTTERLY unaware that Peterson is talking about HIM during the entire interview. Learn from your enemies, they have skills that we need.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 1 pt

FUCK (((JUDEN PETERSON))) AND THE KIKES ON THIS BOARD PROMOTING HIM

Pay attention to the usernames in this thread.

[–] • 0 pt

After a few years on these alternative internet boards and I’m coming to really understand the motives of posters like the OP.

It seems that at the end of the day the anger (like you showed via strong, capitalized statement) really doesn’t bring much positive change either online or in person. Being too aggressive, especially in real life, mostly works to damage future relationships. While the advice shared by OP will often lead to eventual agreement and healing.

But I could be wrong. Maybe consistent aggression works sometimes.

[–] • 1 pt

What are Juden Peterson's opinions on the holocaust, race mixing and Israel?

[–] • 0 pt

Probably wrong, like most people’s.

If you are claiming that a mistaken view on the Holocaust is enough to invalidate a persons complete catalogue of personal beliefs in your perspective would you be willing to provide me with a list of people who you think are correct enough in their total worldview as to justify listening to their words? I’m just curious as to those you choose to use as sources of information as your required virtue levels would seem to me to leave you with very, very few people who would have anything of value to impart to you.

Personally, I prefer to listen to most people and just pick and choose which of their messages I desire to accept within myself.

In spite of our differences I have been highly benefited from my mental association with Peterson and I am very grateful for many of the things he’s helped teach me.