Learn from your enemies - Jordan Peterson slices and dices an idiot

1.1K

•

Learn from your enemies - Jordan Peterson slices and dices an idiot (www.youtube.com)

However, there is A LOT that we can learn from him. When Peterson first came out with his narratives, he pulled all of humanity forward in understanding and armed everyone with weapons of narrative and context. Some of us expect him to take that into one direction or another, but, he chose to take a stand against us.

Fair enough, there are rasons beyond ((( ))).

However, a student of boxing doesn't study the greats to worship them. A student of boxing studies the greats to learn technique, learn context, learn strengths and weaknesses and how to think about understanding their own skills as they enter the ring.

Here is a great example of a master of language, narrative, context and relative subject matter peeling the skin off of a basically a leftist retard. Well, maybe harsh. The leftist cannot be granted anything more than the label of retard, but, really he is what Dr. Ed Dutton calls a MIDWIT.

The clip is really instructive in technique and approach. On the one hand, Peterson has the following options:

lose
draw
win

Obviously he doesn't want to lose. However, winning an argument with a midwit like the interviewer is easy, if you are quick enough you can easily make him look like a fool by making everything he says into a joke. This is easy because everything the midwit says sounds deep but isn't.

Instead, Peterson leaves winning off the table and instead choose to, EVERY TIME, to take the argument and create a situation where the conversation is a draw. He gets to demonstrate to the audience that he is intellectually dancing around someone who is basically retarded, but he does it without putting them down and onboarding the stench of bad faith. Instead, he lets the midwit and his audience hold the shovels full of shit and demonstrate to the world their true nature (usually via post interview responses). In a way, Peterson wins the argument by deliberately going for a draw and winning on higher levels of execution an polish.

Vid is also an excellent example of Peterson trying to explain to a midwit that the problem with midwits trying to fix the world is that they are midwits and they don't have the skills to actually fix anything. The leftist retard is UTTERLY unaware that Peterson is talking about HIM during the entire interview.

Learn from your enemies, they have skills that we need.

We talk a lot of shit around here and dump on people like Jew Peterson because he pretended to be what he is not. I have my doubts about those critiques being true, but none the less, he did explicitly come out as being anti-white which is taking the position that white people need to die. However, there is A LOT that we can learn from him. When Peterson first came out with his narratives, he pulled all of humanity forward in understanding and armed everyone with weapons of narrative and context. Some of us expect him to take that into one direction or another, but, he chose to take a stand against us. Fair enough, there are rasons beyond ((( ))). However, a student of boxing doesn't study the greats to worship them. A student of boxing studies the greats to learn technique, learn context, learn strengths and weaknesses and how to think about understanding their own skills as they enter the ring. Here is a great example of a master of language, narrative, context and relative subject matter peeling the skin off of a basically a leftist retard. Well, maybe harsh. The leftist cannot be granted anything more than the label of retard, but, really he is what Dr. Ed Dutton calls a MIDWIT. The clip is really instructive in technique and approach. On the one hand, Peterson has the following options: * lose * draw * win Obviously he doesn't want to lose. However, winning an argument with a midwit like the interviewer is easy, if you are quick enough you can easily make him look like a fool by making everything he says into a joke. This is easy because everything the midwit says sounds deep but isn't. Instead, Peterson leaves winning off the table and instead choose to, EVERY TIME, to take the argument and create a situation where the conversation is a draw. He gets to demonstrate to the audience that he is intellectually dancing around someone who is basically retarded, but he does it without putting them down and onboarding the stench of bad faith. Instead, he lets the midwit and his audience hold the shovels full of shit and demonstrate to the world their true nature (usually via post interview responses). In a way, Peterson wins the argument by deliberately going for a draw and winning on higher levels of execution an polish. Vid is also an excellent example of Peterson trying to explain to a midwit that the problem with midwits trying to fix the world is that they are midwits and they don't have the skills to actually fix anything. The leftist retard is UTTERLY unaware that Peterson is talking about HIM during the entire interview. Learn from your enemies, they have skills that we need.

(post is archived)