That does not explain origin of life. It explains changes in life. If it is natural that life forms in conditions like our planet's through a vast generalization of that process, why is it that we only have evidence for a single genesis event? Why hasn't life emerged multiple independent times? If it's a natural process it would be strange for it to occur only once in the huge span of time that our planet has been able to support life. Personally I'm a hybridist. Look at the scattering of Israel. God communicated that he was going to do it before it happened (Isaiah/Jeremiah), he did it, but he didn't poof them to every corner of the planet in an instant. He used real world mechanisms. We see that he uses tools that work in the real world. Evolution works in the real world. Sounds like a useful tool. The question is then if it was guided. There doesn't need to be a vs. There isn't a vs for Scattering vs Babylon/Assyria. It's a classic case of description vs mechanism. It's like saying I don't think planes fly because what I think really happens is air sweeps over the top of the wing and its trajectory is curved downward due to hugging the curved wing leaving it in a downward trajectory as it leaves the wing resulting in a net upward force due to Newton's 2nd law. Believing planes fly is fanciful.