Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 8 pts

Evolution is just a series of mutations in which one or more of these mutations becomes dominant within the species. It's very provable.

[–] • 2 pts

Yes species evolve in to new species many such cases, no I can't name any of these cases or provide evidence but these minor changes in phenomal expression totally prove speciation, to those of us who trust the science.

[–] • 3 pts

What do you think dog breeds are....

[–] • 0 pt

Dog breeds are genetic variations of a single species. What do you think speciation is?

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

That does not explain origin of life. It explains changes in life.

If it is natural that life forms in conditions like our planet's through a vast generalization of that process, why is it that we only have evidence for a single genesis event? Why hasn't life emerged multiple independent times? If it's a natural process it would be strange for it to occur only once in the huge span of time that our planet has been able to support life.

Personally I'm a hybridist. Look at the scattering of Israel. God communicated that he was going to do it before it happened (Isaiah/Jeremiah), he did it, but he didn't poof them to every corner of the planet in an instant. He used real world mechanisms. We see that he uses tools that work in the real world. Evolution works in the real world. Sounds like a useful tool. The question is then if it was guided.

There doesn't need to be a vs. There isn't a vs for Scattering vs Babylon/Assyria. It's a classic case of description vs mechanism. It's like saying I don't think planes fly because what I think really happens is air sweeps over the top of the wing and its trajectory is curved downward due to hugging the curved wing leaving it in a downward trajectory as it leaves the wing resulting in a net upward force due to Newton's 2nd law. Believing planes fly is fanciful.

[–] • 1 pt

Macro evolution shows a portion of it, yet fails to explain the gaps in between (which they can only go by guessing). Micro evolution which does show the gradual progression over time is the easiest to explain and observe.

[–] • 5 pts

Has anyone proved creation or intelligent design?

[–] • 3 pts

How would that be possible without proving the existence of (a) God?!

Still waiting for that one..

There is a metric fuckton of evidence for the pro-evolution case and not many scientists will waste time trying to disprove Divine Intervention.

"Intelligent design" as a concept is often skewed into something unrecognizable, by people with a religious, non-scientific agenda.

Look everywhere in nature and you'll experience intelligent design.. even in humans..

[–] • 2 pts

The problem is conflation of evolution and origin.

[–] • 2 pts

That's my point. All sides of a debate have to be held to the same evidentiary standards.

[–] • 0 pt

Nothing in nature has a "design." There are mutations which enabled the host to better survive existing conditions then those without the mutation. That's it

If there is a "designer" at work it's a really stupid one given the number of useless and detrimental designs.

[–] • 0 pt

Everything in nature have a design and purpose of it; nature contains no empirically proven meaninglessness and if it appears to do, then the purpose have not been discovered..

Mutation can be a result of adjustment towards adaptation, but can also be a result of incompatibility with a environment and even seemingly successful (series of-) mutations can lead down a one way street to a dead end and extinction. If the rules change too rapidly, "nature" can't compensate timely.

I won't propose that there is a designer, other than a highly likely universal law, that determines how a structure or gestalt must be to successfully operate or even exist in any given environment.

[–] • 2 pts

It's been 170 years, surely you guys have one example of speciation by now?

Or at least 1 "missing link" fossil to show a transition, from anything to anything. I mean evolution has been happening for billions of years, right?

Ok yeah that's right you haven't proven shit. Shut the fuck up. You hold an 'unproven' belief, no different from people who believe in God.

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 1 pt

me change color of dog hair evOlUtIoN iD reEl gUiS

[–] • 1 pt

Evolution was proved a long time ago. They took one group of flies and selectively bred them into two distinct groups that could breed within their new groups but couldn't breed with each other.

Besides, does Evolution sound more unlikely to you than a Jewish sandnigger deity saying, "Let there be light!"

[–] • 0 pt

So basically they stayed as flies......and not a different kind?

[–] • 1 pt

They became two distinct species. That's evolution.

[–] • 0 pt

The let there be light allegory is a bastardization of ancient European religions.

[–] • 0 pt

Flat-earthers who can't do critical thought. Unlike flat-earthers, these people don't even need government funding to sow their garbage.

[–] • 0 pt

The amount of stupid in this video and christianity in general is astounding.

This is basically a documentary on people that are so low iq they couldn't think their way out of a paper bag.