They could be made. There is also strength in numbers.
Sure, but it’s a lot harder to get together large numbers of people who will stand behind Stone Age weapons than to get smaller numbers of people to stand behind AKs and ARs
Ten of us rush one of them, they will take down at most one of us before the rest get over there and clock his brains onto the pavement. Now we got an assault weapon.
It's not just a matter of reaction time and the ability to switch targets under tense situations, it's also a psychological game as well, they aren't used to being pushed back against in a violent way by white skinned blue blooded English men.
This guy is reading from a script, too afraid to think for himself, or even to take responsibility for his actions, his kind of mind sees his job as just a set of tasks for himself to do, his brain is turned off because he feels safe.
He will absolutely lose his shit once he realizes he is an enemy soldier in a war, and that people who he previously felt comfortable with pushing around start going for his throat rather than being mostly compliant and occasionally a bothersome nuisance, once we are a threat, his sanity will start to shift from the pressure.
Also, in an urban environment you have options, attacking from multiple angles, surprise attacks, traps, a good bull rushing, etc.
And that's assuming all the bobbies are on the same team, which they bloody well won't be once the fur start to fly, when the fight comes, a lot of em will defect or turn tail.
The police are weak willed spineless cowards, any gun is good enough to take a life with if you use it right, the thing that really matters is the man behind it, no amount of technological superiority will matter if the guy holding it is unfit to fight.
And most of these beatsticks ain't. They are soft cunts who want a rush of power, those who joined for more noble causes have left for us, or are waiting for a chance to betray their fellows to the likes of us.
We outnumber them, we can outfight them, what weapons they got is nothing next to these disadvantages. We fight, we win. Simple as.
Ten of us rush one of them, they will take down at most one of us before the rest get over there and clock his brains onto the pavement
Ok, now recite the speech you will use to convince ten people to do this with you knowing that there’s a 1/10 chance they will die (when realistically the chance is much higher than 1/10, I could easily take out 3-4 people of a group of ten with just my pistol)
Is that why so many more people in places like the United States stand up against cops?
Cops have never done anything wrong to me, why would I stand up to them?
What would William Wallace do
(post is archived)