Yes, but the claims and their supporting evidence/arguments were simple and intuitive, building off of what was commonly known, add in some observations that were made, then explaining the conclusions from those observations, and finally arriving at the ultimate claim.
Yes, but the claims and their supporting evidence/arguments were simple and intuitive, building off of what was commonly known, add in some observations that were made, then explaining the conclusions from those observations, and finally arriving at the ultimate claim.
(post is archived)