Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

The conversation between Andrew and Peterson really summarizes leadership, why we want competent leadership, why we venerate competent leadership and how we need to keep an eye on our leadership.

Out of this conversation, you can start to see some of the tribal dynamics, where we have failed in the west as white men (to keep control of our leadership) and how we have allowed mimics to insert them selves into the hierarchy and start to poison our civilizations.

The answer as to how we fix our civilizations fall right out of this conversation.

Yes, yes, jew jew jew, blah, blah, blah. It isn't a full discussion, but it is a good skeleton description of the core components of the mechanics underpinning all the conversations that sit on top of this shape.

The conversation between Andrew and Peterson really summarizes leadership, why we want competent leadership, why we venerate competent leadership and how we need to keep an eye on our leadership. Out of this conversation, you can start to see some of the tribal dynamics, where we have failed in the west as white men (to keep control of our leadership) and how we have allowed mimics to insert them selves into the hierarchy and start to poison our civilizations. The answer as to how we fix our civilizations fall right out of this conversation. Yes, yes, jew jew jew, blah, blah, blah. It isn't a full discussion, but it is a good skeleton description of the core components of the mechanics underpinning all the conversations that sit on top of this shape.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 0 pt

You don't really need to go that far in the thought process.

He's just like Jared Taylor. They will never call out jews for who they are, and calls them Whites instead when the topic can't be avoided.

That's what controlled opposition is.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

That is a fair point. Realistically, if you only ask to go half way that is where you end up.

This is what I really liked about Trump. He understands that everything is a negotiation. If you want to get what you want, you ask for more than you get and negotiate your way down. If you only ask for half of what you want, you get less than that.

We really need to start doing the big ask.

[–] • 0 pt

There's no negotiating with these parasites. You'll always lose if you try.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Well, technically, the persuasion conversation is for our people. This is why Jared is doing a half ask instead of a full ask. He feels he cannot package the big ask in a way that is palatable. He actually was in software sales, he knows how to sell. There are videos of him on Gary Killdalls tv show doing software sales type thing.

Which brings up the persuasion question of how to understand the spectrum of challenges that stand in the way of a big ask being able to penetrate and get our people re-align their aliegences.

You have done a good job with this site.